The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Socioeconomic differentials in mortality risk among men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: I. White men.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examined socioeconomic differentials in risk of death from a number of specific causes in a large cohort of White men in the United States. METHODS: For 300 685 White men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial between 1973 and 1975, data were collected on median income of White households in the zip code of residence, age, cigarette smoking, blood pressure, serum cholesterol, previous myocardial infarction, and drug treatment for diabetes. The 31 737 deaths that occurred over the 16-year follow-up period were grouped into specific causes and related to median White family income. RESULTS: There was an inverse association between age- adjusted all-cause mortality and median family income. There was no attenuation of this association over the follow-up period, and the association was similar for the 22 clinical centers carrying out the screening. The gradient was seen for many-but not all-of the specific causes of death. Other risk factors accounted for some of the association between income and coronary heart disease and smoking-related cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic position, as measured by median family income of area of residence, is an important determinant of mortality risk in White men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The proof and measurement of association between two things
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412159 · Cited by 8,039
Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2626958 · Cited by 5,722
Pappas, G., Queen, S., Hadden, W., & Fisher, G. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199307083290207 · Cited by 1,524
Phillips, A. N., & Smith, G. D. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90155-3 · Cited by 275
Self-citation
Cited by
Contribution of major diseases to disparities in mortality.
Wong, M. D., Shapiro, M. F., Boscardin, W. J., & Ettner, S. L. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa012979 · Cited by 774
Galobardes, B. (2004) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/epirev/mxh008 · Cited by 753
Barr, V., Robinson, S., Marin-Link, B., Underhill, L., Dotts, A., Ravensdale, D., & Salivaras, S. (2003) · Healthcare Quarterly · doi:10.12927/hcq.2003.16763 · Cited by 686
Estimated deaths attributable to social factors in the United States
Galea, S., Tracy, M., Hoggatt, K. J., DiMaggio, C., & Karpati, A. (2011) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2010.300086 · Cited by 606
Understanding sociodemographic differences in health--the role of fundamental social causes.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (1996) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.86.4.471 · Cited by 483
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, G. D., Neaton, J. D., Wentworth, D., Stamler, R., & Stamler, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 486-496
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W4235821015
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socioeconomic differentials in mortality risk among men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: I. White men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.86.4.486
- The paper
- Smith, G. D., Neaton, J. D., Wentworth, D., Stamler, R., & Stamler, J. (1996). Socioeconomic differentials in mortality risk among men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: I. White men. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.86.4.486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.