The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences between US- and foreign-born women in major US racial and ethnic groups.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether there were significant differentials between US-born and foreign-born women in risks of infant mortality, low birthweight, and preterm birth and whether these differentials, if they existed, varied across major US racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: Multivariate logistic regression was applied to national linked birth/infant death records for 1985 through 1987 to estimate overall and ethnic-specific maternal nativity effects on pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Substantial maternal nativity differences in risks of infant mortality and low birthweight were found, with the magnitude of the nativity effect varying significantly across racial/ethnic groups. Overall, foreign-born status was associated with 7% and 20% lower risks of low birthweight and infant mortality, respectively. However, the reduced risk of adverse pregnancy outcome associated with immigrant status tended to be substantially larger for Blacks, Cubans, Mexicans, and Chinese than for other ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal nativity status, along with ethnicity, may serve as an important axis of differentiation in birth outcome studies. Further research needs to be conducted to assess the effects of behavioral, cultural, and psychosocial factors in explaining the nativity differentials observed here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Race, socioeconomic status, and health. The added effects of racism and discrimination
WILLIAMS, D. R. (1999) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08114.x · Cited by 1,522
Lara, M., Gamboa, C., Kahramanian, M. I., Morales, L. S., & Hayes Bautista, D. E. (2005) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144615 · Cited by 1,513
Understanding Racial-ethnic Disparities in Health: Sociological Contributions
Williams, D. R., & Sternthal, M. (2010) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146510383838 · Cited by 744
Immigration and the Health of Asian and Pacific Islander Adults in the United States
Parker Frisbie, W., Cho, Y., & Hummer, R. A. (2001) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/153.4.372 · Cited by 499
Singh, G. K., & Hiatt, R. A. (2006) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyl089 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, G. K., & Yu, S. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 837-843
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2163660377
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences between US- and foreign-born women in major US racial and ethnic groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.86.6.837
- The paper
- Singh, G. K., & Yu, S. M. (1996). Adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences between US- and foreign-born women in major US racial and ethnic groups. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.86.6.837
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.