The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"Broken windows" and the risk of gonorrhea
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined the relationships between neighborhood conditions and gonorrhea. METHODS: We assessed 55 block groups by rating housing and street conditions. We mapped all cases of gonorrhea between 1994 and 1996 and calculated aggregated case rates by block group. We obtained public school inspection reports and assigned findings to the block groups served by the neighborhood schools. A "broken windows" index measured housing quality, abandoned cars, graffiti, trash, and public school deterioration. Using data from the 1990 census and 1995 updates, we determined the association between "broken windows," demographic characteristics, and gonorrhea rates. RESULTS: The broken windows index explained more of the variance in gonorrhea rates than did a poverty index measuring income, unemployment, and low education. In high-poverty neighborhoods, block groups with high broken windows scores had significantly higher gonorrhea rates than block groups with low broken windows scores (46.6 per 1000 vs 25.8 per 1000; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The robust association of deteriorated physical conditions of local neighborhoods with gonorrhea rates, independent of poverty, merits an intervention trial to test whether the environment has a causal role in influencing high-risk sexual behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rosenstreich, D. L., Eggleston, P., Kattan, M., Baker, D., Slavin, R. G., Gergen, P., Mitchell, H., McNiff-Mortimer, K., Lynn, H., Ownby, D., et al. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199705083361904 · Cited by 1,380
Cited by
Ellis (2009) · doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7 · Cited by 1,592
Housing and Health: Time Again for Public Health Action
Krieger, J., & Higgins, D. L. (2002) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.92.5.758 · Cited by 1,550
Social Environment and Physical activity: A review of concepts and evidence
McNeill, L. H., Kreuter, M. W., & Subramanian, S. V. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.012 · Cited by 895
Urban built environment and depression: A multilevel analysis
Galea, S., Ahern, J., Rudenstine, S., Wallace, Z., & Vlahov, D. (2005) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2005.033084 · Cited by 409
Neighborhood physical conditions and health
Cohen, D. A., Mason, K., Bedimo, A., Scribner, R., Basolo, V., & Farley, T. A. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.3.467 · Cited by 378
Self-citation
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 230-236
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W1553311539
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 61.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Broken windows" and the risk of gonorrhea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.90.2.230
- The paper
- "Broken windows" and the risk of gonorrhea. (2000). American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.90.2.230
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.