Encouraging Stair Use: Stair-Riser Banners Are Better Than Posters
Open accessAbstract
Increasing physical activity levels among a largely sedentary public is a health priority.1 Lifestyle exercise, such as walking or stair climbing, has been recommended because it provides substantial health benefits and fits easily into daily routines.2 Opportunities for stair climbing in workplaces, public buildings, and the home are frequently available to most population groups. Studies conducted in both the United States and the United Kingdom have shown that posters at the “point of choice” between escalators and stairs can increase stair use.3–6 As a result, physical activity promoters have championed the use of such posters. In a recent study, however, messages placed as banners on alternate stair risers were associated with a greater increase in shoppers' stair use than that typically observed with posters.7 To confirm the superiority of these banners in promoting stair climbing, we systematically compared the use of poster prompts and stair-riser banners. The study was conducted at 2 shopping malls; both sites had 28-step staircases with adjacent escalators. Following a coding system,3 an observer recorded the number of people using the escalators and stairs on alternate days at each location. Observations were made between 11 am and 1 pm to include day and lunchtime shoppers. At the control site, a 2-week baseline period was followed by 4 weeks during which a poster that read “Stay healthy, use the stairs” was displayed. Use of this poster had been found to be effective in previous research.3 At the experimental site, 2 weeks of baseline observation and 2 weeks of the poster intervention were followed by 2 weeks during which banners, containing mulitple messages, were placed on the stair risers, as in our earlier study.7 Logistic regression analyses were conducted with escalator–stair use as the dichotomous outcome variable. Overall pedestrian traffic volume, a potential confounding variable,3 was calculated as the total number of people using the escalators and stairs during each half-hour period. Traffic volume was entered into the logistic regression models as a continuous variable. Sex, age, and ethnicity were also added to the models, in that previous research had demonstrated their importance.3–6 Figure 1 ▶ illustrates the effects of the poster and banner conditions in the 2 shopping malls. At the control site (n = 12 018), the rate of stair use increased from 2.2% at baseline to 4.8% during the first 2 weeks of the poster exposure but fell slightly to 4.1% during the second 2 weeks. At the experimental site (n = 11 961), stair use increased from 2.4% at baseline to 4.0% when the poster was in place and rose to 6.7% when the banners were displayed on the stair risers. FIGURE 1— Stair use at baseline in poster and banner conditions in the control and experimental shopping malls. Logistic regression analyses revealed that stair use increased at both sites during the first 2 weeks in which the poster was displayed (odds ratio [OR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.69, 2.80), with no significant differences between the sites. During the second intervention period, there was an interaction between the sites (OR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.48, 2.87) such that rates of stair use were higher with the banners at the experimental site than with the poster at the control site. There are several reasons why the banners were more effective than the poster in encouraging stair use. First, the banners were highly visible. In our earlier studies, 76% of interviewees reported seeing these banners,7 whereas only a third reported noticing the poster used.8 Second, while the poster included only one health-related message, the banners contained multiple messages, such as “Keep fit,” “Be active,” and “Free exercise.” As such, they are likely to appeal to a broader population range.9 Regular stair climbing has been associated with discernible health gains.10 Accordingly, if large population groups are regularly exposed to motivating stair banners instead of the posters currently used by health promoters, the public health dividends could be considerable.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In another intervention, motivational posters or banners encouraging use of stairs, when posted next to escalators adjacent to stairs, increased stair use from 2.4% at baseline to 4% for posters and to 6.7% for banners; this increase was sustained at 10 weeks after signage was removed.
“In another intervention, motivational posters or banners encouraging use of stairs, when posted next to escalators adjacent to stairs, increased stair use from 2.4% at baseline to 4% for posters and to 6.7% for banners; this increase was sustained at 10 weeks after signage was removed.128,129”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [128]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 101
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [8]Kerr J, Eves FF, Carroll D. Posters can prompt less active individuals to use stairs. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:942–943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Authors
- Kerr, J., Eves, F., & Carroll, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1192-1193
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC1446744
- OpenAlex
- W2097798748
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Resources and Services Administration
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- stair climbing, physical activity promotion, escalators, shopping centers, sedentary behavior, message framing, intervention comparison
- MeSH terms
- Elevators and Escalators, Health Promotion, Humans, Motivation, Persuasive Communication, Program Evaluation, Public Health Practice, Logistic Models, Walking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review