The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk Factors for Femicide in Abusive Relationships: Results From a Multisite Case Control Study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This 11-city study sought to identify risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships. METHODS: Proxies of 220 intimate partner femicide victims identified from police or medical examiner records were interviewed, along with 343 abused control women. RESULTS: Preincident risk factors associated in multivariate analyses with increased risk of intimate partner femicide included perpetrator's access to a gun and previous threat with a weapon, perpetrator's stepchild in the home, and estrangement, especially from a controlling partner. Never living together and prior domestic violence arrest were associated with lowered risks. Significant incident factors included the victim having left for another partner and the perpetrator's use of a gun. Other significant bivariate-level risks included stalking, forced sex, and abuse during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: There are identifiable risk factors for intimate partner femicides.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Separation from an abusive partner is often thought to be the solution to ending violence; yet, abuse and the risk for lethality often escalates following separation”
From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“Estimating from the Campbell et al. (2003) 12-city intimate partner femicide study, approximately 44% of those women were separated from their partners when killed.”
From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“The first 3 months and the first year following separation are the most lethal, with the risk declining over time (Campbell et al., 2003; Campbell et al., 2007).”
From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“The move into threat mirrors the escalation often seen in domestic violence and abuse when the perpetrator senses they have lost control of the victim or they are going to leave the relationship (Campbell et al. 2003).”
From The Language of Romance Crimes (2024) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. 2003
Citations
Cites
Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model
Hosmer, D., & Lemesbow, S. (1980) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610928008827941 · Cited by 1,780
Gun Ownership as a Risk Factor for Homicide in the Home
Kellermann, A. L., Rivara, F. P., Rushforth, N. B., Banton, J. G., Reay, D. T., Francisco, J. T., Locci, A. B., Prodzinski, J., Hackman, B. B., & Somes, G. W. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199310073291506 · Cited by 679
Femicide: The Politics of Woman Killing
(1994) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/000486589402700212 · Cited by 614
Spousal Homicide Risk and Estrangement
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.8.1.3 · Cited by 470
Forced Sex and Intimate Partner Violence
Campbell, J. C., & Soeken, K. L. (1999) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801299005009003 · Cited by 371
Self-citationBatterer Intervention Systems: Issues, Outcomes, and Recommendations
Gondolf, E. W. (2002) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452229263 · Cited by 363
Violence in families: assessing prevention and treatment programs.
Chalk, R. A., & King, P. A. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 307
Stalking and Intimate Partner Femicide
McFARLANE, J. M., Campbell, J. C., Wilt, S., Sachs, C. J., Ulrich, Y. C., & Xu, X. (1999) · Homicide Studies · doi:10.1177/1088767999003004003 · Cited by 291
Self-citationEmpowering survivors of abuse : health care for battered women and their children
Campbell, J. C., & Nurses, N. (1998) · Cited by 271
Self-citationRisk factors for violent death of women in the home.
Bailey, J., Kellermann, A., Somes, G. W., Banton, J. G., Rivara, F., & Rushforth, N. P. (1997) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1997.00440280101009 · Cited by 263
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mokdad (2018) · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0158 · Cited by 1,517
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-6509 · Cited by 1,152
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008) · Family Court Review · doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x · Cited by 801
Intimate Partner Homicide: Review and Implications of Research and Policy
Campbell, J. C., Glass, N., Sharps, P. W., Laughon, K., & Bloom, T. (2007) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838007303505 · Cited by 698
Self-citationCampbell, J. C., Webster, D. W., & Glass, N. (2009) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260508317180 · Cited by 650
“An item on prior arrest of the abusive partner for IPV was substituted for the abuser “being violent outside of the home” because it was significantly predictive in the multivariate analysis (Campbell et al., 2003b).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., Gary, F., Glass, N., McFarlane, J., Sachs, C., Sharps, P., Ulrich, Y., Wilt, S. A., Manganello, J., Xu, X., Schollenberger, J., Frye, V., & Laughon, K.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Jacquelyn C. Campbell, Phyllis Sharps, and Kathryn Laughon are with the School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md. Daniel Webster, Jennifer Manganello, and Janet Schollenberger are with the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University. Jane Koziol-McLain is with the School of Nursing, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. Carolyn Rebecca Block is with the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, Chicago. Doris Campbell is with the College of...
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1089-1097
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC1447915
- OpenAlex
- W2145963088
- Cited by
- 1,550
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 136 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 37.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA/AA 11156)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Keywords
- femicide, intimate partner violence, risk factors, domestic violence, firearm access, stepchildren, estrangement, separation from partner, stalking, forced sex, murder victims
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Homicide, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Spouse Abuse, United States, Urban Population, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Battered Women
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
