Cited by 700Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGun Ownership and Violence Research

Intimate Partner Homicide: Review and Implications of Research and Policy

Campbell, Jacquelyn C., Glass, Nancy, Sharps, Phyllis W., Laughon, Kathryn, Bloom, Tina·2007·Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Abstract

Current rates of intimate partner homicide of females are approximately 4 to 5 times the rate for male victims, although the rates for both have decreased during the past 25 years. The major risk factor for intimate partner homicide, no matter if a female or male partner is killed, is prior domestic violence. This review presents and critiques the evidence supporting the other major risk factors for intimate partner homicide in general, and for intimate partner homicide of women (femicide) in particular, namely guns, estrangement, stepchild in the home, forced sex, threats to kill, and nonfatal strangulation (choking). The demographic risk factors are also examined and the related phenomena of pregnancy-related homicide, attempted femicide, and intimate partner homicide-suicide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1524838007303505

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of physical and legal separation created the greatest risk of murder by an intimate partner.

    “The combination of physical and legal separation created the greatest risk of murder by an intimate partner (Campbell et al., 2007; Ellis, 2017; Wilson & Daly, 1993).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2007

  • The first 3 months and the first year following separation are the most lethal, with the risk declining over time.

    “The first 3 months and the first year following separation are the most lethal, with the risk declining over time (Campbell et al., 2003; Campbell et al., 2007).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, J. C., Glass, N., Sharps, P. W., Laughon, K., & Bloom, T.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Published
2007-07
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
246-269
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
OpenAlex
W2048195841
Cited by
698
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 20
FWCI
15.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Keywords
intimate partner homicide, femicide, domestic violence, risk factors, firearms, estrangement, stepchildren, forced sex, gender differences in homicide
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Homicide, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Prevention, Sex Offenses, Sexual Partners, Social Responsibility, Social Values, Socioeconomic Factors, Spouse Abuse, United States, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review