The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Densities of Bones of White and Negro Skeletons
Abstract
The densities See Equation in the PDF file of the cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae, sacra, ribs, humeri, radii, ulnae, femora, and tibiae from eighty adult skeletons were determined. The skeletons were derived equally from American whites and Negroes of both sexes, each group with a wide age range. The weight of the bones was determined with the bones in a dry, fat-free state, and the volumes were measured by displacement of millet seed. It was found that: 1. In both white and Negro males the mean densities of radii, ulnae, and tibiae did not differ from each other, but they were significantly higher than the densities of ribs, humeri, and femora which did not differ from each other; cervical vertebrae were significantly less dense than the last-named series, but denser than the thoracic vertebrae and lumbar vertebrae and the sacra, which likewise did not differ from each other. In females of both races the mean densities of the five long limb bones and ribs did not differ from each other, but they were significantly higher than the densities of the four segments of the vertebral column which did not differ significantly from each other except that the cervical vertebrae were significantly more dense than the sacra in white females. 2. The density of each bone series in each sex-race group decreased witih age although not significantly so in eleven of the forty slopes studied. The combined slope of the densities of the ten bone series in each sex-race group decreased significantly with age. The decline occurred at approximately the same rate in each bone series within each group. 3. After correction for age differences among the four sex-race groups the four mean densities of each bone series (except the ribs and femora) differed significantly. The difference in cervical vertebrae, in humeri, and in ulnae was attributable to sex (male bones denser than female and to race (Negro bones denser than white). In the radii and in tibiae the difference was attributable to sex only; and in the thoracic vertebrae, in lumbar vertebrae, and in the sacra, to race only. Thus, from this study of ten series of bones from the same skeletons it was found with only few exceptions that long limb bones and ribs are denser than vertebrae; that cervical vertebrae are denser than the other segments of the column in males, but not significantly so in females; that bones of the Negro skeleton are denser than bones of the white skeleton; and that bones of the male skeleton are denser than bones of the female skeleton. Furthermore, it was suggested by this study that within each sex-race group bones decrease in density with age at a uniform and parallel rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bone's mechanostat: A 2003 update
Frost, H. M. (2003) · The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1002/ar.a.10119 · Cited by 1,535
How Useful Is Body Mass Index for Comparison of Body Fatness across Age, Sex, and Ethnic Groups?
Gallagher, D., Visser, M., Sepulveda, D., Pierson, R. N., Harris, T., & Heymsfield, S. B. (1996) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008733 · Cited by 1,513
Adult lean body mass declines with age: Some longitudinal observations
Forbes, G. B., & Reina, J. C. (1970) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/0026-0495(70)90062-4 · Cited by 684
Heymsfield, S. B., Peterson, C. M., Thomas, D. M., Heo, M., & Schuna, J. M. (2016) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12358 · Cited by 470
Measures of body composition in blacks and whites: a comparative review
Wagner, D. R., & Heyward, V. H. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1392 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Trotter, M., Broman, G. E., & Peterson, R. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1960-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-58
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1899699449
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Densities of Bones of White and Negro Skeletons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-196042010-00005
- The paper
- Trotter, M., Broman, G. E., & Peterson, R. R. (1960). Densities of Bones of White and Negro Skeletons. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196042010-00005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.