Cited by 397Body Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, DietRace, Genetics, and Society

Measures of body composition in blacks and whites: a comparative review

Open access
Wagner, Dale R, Heyward, Vivian H·2000·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Biological differences exist in the body composition of blacks and whites. We reviewed literature on the differences and similarities between the 2 races relative to fat-free body mass (water, mineral, and protein), fat patterning, and body dimensions and proportions. In general, blacks have a greater bone mineral density and body protein content than do whites, resulting in a greater fat-free body density. Additionally, there are racial differences in the distribution of subcutaneous fat and the length of the limbs relative to the trunk. The possibility that these differences are a result of ethnicity rather than of race is also examined. Because most equations that predict relative body fat were derived from predominantly white samples, biological variation between the races in these body-composition indexes has practical significance. Systematic error can result in the inaccurate estimation of the relative body fat of blacks, and therefore of definitions of obesity, if these inherent differences are ignored.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1392

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in body properties related to obesity and ethnicity may prevent a single BIA equation from being best for all.

    “mounting evidence suggests that the differences in the properties of the body, such as those related to obesity (3) and ethnicity (6,9,33), may prevent this from becoming a reality.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Nelson DA, Barondess DA. Whole body bone, fat and lean mass in children: comparison of three ethnic groups. Am J Phys Anthropol 1997;103:157-62.
  2. Trotter M, Broman GE, Peterson RR. The density of the humeri of American whites and negroes. Leech 1958;28:139-43.
  3. Robson JRK, Bazin M, Soderstrom R. Ethnic differences in skinfold thickness. Am J Clin Nutr 1971;24:864-8.
  4. Baumgartner RN, Chumlea WC, Roche AF. Bioelectrical imped- ance for body composition. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1990;18:193-224.
  5. Brown PJ. The biocultural evolution of obesity: an anthropological view. In: Bjorntorp P, Brodoff BN, eds. Obesity. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1992:320-9.
  6. Luke AH, Rotimi CN, Cooper RS, et al. Leptin and body composi- tion of Nigerians, Jamaicans, and U.S. blacks. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67:391-6.
  7. Stolarczyk LM, Heyward VH, Van Loan MD, Hicks VL, Wilson WL, Reano LM. The fatness-specific bioelectrical impedance analy- sis equations: are they generalizable and practical? Am J Clin Nutr 1997;66:8-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagner, D. R., & Heyward, V. H.
Affiliations
Vanguard University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
1392-1402
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1871170274
Cited by
397
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
body composition, racial differences, black and white populations, fat-free mass, bone mineral density, body protein, subcutaneous fat distribution, limb length, body proportions, ethnicity, obesity definition, measurement error
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Body Constitution, Body Water, Humans, Minerals, Proteins, Bone Density, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review