Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Giant-Cell Tumors of Bone (Osteoclastoma): A Pathological and Histochemical Study

Schajowicz, Fritz·1961·The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery

Abstract

1. A series of eighty-five cases of giant-cell tumors of bone studied in the course of the last twenty years is reviewed. Comparative clinical, roentgenographic, pathological, and systematic histochemical studies have been carried out. 2. The clinical and pathological findings confirm the necessity of treating these tumors as an entity, because they are neoplastic processes capable of progressive growth, recur in a large percentage of cases, and, in 7 to 15 per cent of cases become transformed into sarcomata. They may produce metastases without visible malignant transformation. The so-called variants, which in general have a favorable prognosis, are easily distinguishable from true giant-cell tumors. 3. With the exception of a few rare cases showing a frankly malignant microscopic structure, there was no evident correlation between the histological appearance and the clinical and roentgenographic features. For this reason, grading of this neoplasm is now considered of little value. It is sufficient to establish a diagnosis of true giant-cell tumor to justify complete resection of the lesion. This diagnosis can be made by aspiration biopsy. 4. I believe that the giant cell derives from the mononuclear cell of the stroma and is thus of mesenchymal origin. I think that it is formed not only by agglutination and conglomeration of these cells, as is maintained by the majority of writers, but also by repeated division of the stromal-cell nuclei, without corresponding cytoplasmic division. This is probably accomplished by amitosis or nuclear segmentation, which has been observed in tissue cultures. 5. Systematic histochemical investigations of normal tissues, true giantcell tumors, and many bone lesions and extra-osseous lesions, which are characterized by the richness of multinucleated giant cells, were done. The giant cells in these tissues have a very similar histochemical behavior. A close physiological and histogenetic relationship is thus established between normal osteoclastic and chondroclastic giant cells and those of giant-cell tumor. 6. Giant cells are characterized by an abundance of acid phosphatase, betaglucuronidase, and succinic dehydrogenase; the absence of alkaline phosphatase; and the presence in their cytoplasm of non-glycogen carbohydrates, principally acid mucopolysaccharides, and complex lipids. The stromal cells of giant-cell tumors do not generally show enzymatic reactions, nor do they possess glycogen, mucopolysaccharides, or glycolipids in significant amounts. 7. Histochemical study is of no diagnostic value when differentiating the giant-cell tumor from its so-called variants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/00004623-196143010-00001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schajowicz, F.
Venue
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
Published
1961-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
1-29
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2547946985
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.