The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arthroscopic acromioplasty. Technique and results.
Abstract
Of forty-four patients who were treated by arthroscopic acromioplasty from July 1984 through August 1986, forty were available for analysis. The average age was 43.2 years, and 86 per cent of them had participated regularly in sports but were disabled due to symptoms of impingement. All patients had had a minimum of six months of non-operative therapy. The final diagnoses, which were based on the findings at arthroscopy and on clinical examination, plain radiographs, and arthrograms, were Stage-II impingement in twenty-four patients, a partial-thickness tear of the rotator cuff in six, and a full-thickness tear of the rotator cuff in ten. The shoulders were scored before the operation and again at follow-up. Preoperatively, thirty-six shoulders were rated as poor and four, as fair. After a minimum follow-up of twelve months (average, seventeen months), the scores had increased in all but one patient. The result was rated good or excellent in twenty-nine (73 per cent) of the forty patients: twenty of the twenty-four who had Stage-II impingement, four of the six who had a partial-thickness tear, and six of the ten who had a full-thickness tear. The over-all average time to return to work was nine days, and the average time to return to sports was 2.4 months. Of the thirty-three patients who had participated in sports, twenty-five (76 per cent) had returned to sports activity at the time of the most recent follow-up. The average time until full recovery was 3.8 months. There were no complications, and, over-all, thirty-eight (92 per cent) of the forty patients were satisfied with the result. In four patients, the result was a failure, and three of the four had a reoperation that relieved the symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lukasiewicz, A. C., McClure, P., Michener, L., Pratt, N., Sennett, B., Ludewig, P., Lukasiewicz, A. C., McClure, P., Michener, L., Pratt, N., et al. (1999) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.1999.29.10.574 · Cited by 675
Non-Operative Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome*
Morrison, D. S., Frogameni, A. D., & Woodworth, P. (1997) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) · doi:10.2106/00004623-199705000-00013 · Cited by 256
Henkus, H. E., de Witte, P. B., Nelissen, R. G. H. H., Brand, R., & van Arkel, E. R. A. (2009) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.91b4.21442 · Cited by 118
Arthroscopic versus open acromioplasty: a prospective, randomized, blinded study
Spangehl, M. J., Hawkins, R. H., McCormack, R. G., & Loomer, R. L. (2002) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1067/mse.2002.120915 · Cited by 69
Rate of return to work and driving following arthroscopic subacromial decompression
McClelland, D., Paxinos, A., & Dodenhoff, R. M. (2005) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03529.x · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Altchek, D. W., Warren, R. F., Wickiewicz, T. L., Skyhar, M. J., Ortiz, G., & Schwartz, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1198-1207
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157265786
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arthroscopic acromioplasty. Technique and results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-199072080-00011
- The paper
- Altchek, D. W., Warren, R. F., Wickiewicz, T. L., Skyhar, M. J., Ortiz, G., & Schwartz, E. (1990). Arthroscopic acromioplasty. Technique and results. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199072080-00011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.