The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of low-frequency electrical fields on osteogenesis.
Abstract
An in vivo animal model of disuse osteopenia was used to determine the osteogenic potential of specific components of electrical fields. The ability of a complex pulsed electrical field to inhibit loss of bone was compared with the remodeling response generated by extremely low-power, low-frequency (fifteen, seventy-five, and 150-hertz) sinusoidal electrical fields. The left ulnae of thirty adult male turkeys were functionally isolated by creation of distal and proximal epiphyseal osteotomies and then were exposed, for one hour each day, to an electrical field that had been induced exogenously by means of magnetic induction. After a fifty-six-day protocol, the remodeling response was quantified by a comparison of the cross-sectional area of the mid-part of the diaphysis of the functionally isolated ulna with that of the intact contralateral ulna. Disuse resulted in a 13 per cent mean loss of osseous tissue, which was not significantly different than the 10 per cent loss that was caused by disuse treated with inactive coils. Exposure to the pulsed electrical fields prevented this osteopenia and stimulated a 10 per cent mean increase in the bone area. The osteogenic influence of the sinusoidal electrical fields was strongly dependent on the frequency; the 150, seventy-five, and fifteen-hertz sinusoidal fields, respectively, generated a -3 per cent, + 5 per cent, and + 20 per cent mean change in the bone area. These results suggest a tissue sensitivity that is specific to very low-frequency sinusoidal electrical fields, and they imply that the induced electrical fields need not have complex waveforms to be osteogenic. Since the frequency and intensity range of the sinusoidal fields producing the greatest osteogenic response are similar to the levels produced intrinsically by normal functional activity, these results support the hypothesis that electricity plays a role in the retention of the normal remodeling balance within mature bone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain
Duncan, R. L., & Turner, C. H. (1995) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf00302070 · Cited by 1,048
Mechanical Strain and Bone Cell Function: A Review
Ehrlich, P. J., & Lanyon, L. E. (2002) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980200095 · Cited by 512
Nikander, R., Sievänen, H., Heinonen, A., Daly, R. M., Uusi-Rasi, K., & Kannus, P. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-47 · Cited by 479
Low Magnitude Mechanical Loading Is Osteogenic in Children With Disabling Conditions
Ward, K., Alsop, C., Caulton, J., Rubin, C., Adams, J., & Mughal, Z. (2004) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.040129 · Cited by 432
Self-citationElectrical Stimulation: A Novel Tool for Tissue Engineering
Balint, R., Cassidy, N. J., & Cartmell, S. H. (2013) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0183 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- McLeod, K. J., & Rubin, C. T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 920-929
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1957911438
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of low-frequency electrical fields on osteogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-199274060-00014
- The paper
- McLeod, K. J., & Rubin, C. T. (1992). The effect of low-frequency electrical fields on osteogenesis. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274060-00014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.