The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Locking Intramedullary Nailing with and without Reaming for Open Fractures of the Tibial Shaft. A Prospective, Randomized Study*
Abstract
Ninety-one patients who had ninety-four open fractures of the tibial shaft were randomized into two treatment groups. Fifty fractures (nine type-I, eighteen type-II, sixteen type-IIIA, and seven type-IIIB fractures, according to the classification of Gustilo et al.) were treated with nailing after reaming, and forty-four fractures (five type-I, sixteen type-II, nineteen type-IIIA, and four type-IIIB fractures) were treated with nailing without reaming. The average diameter of the nail was 11.5 millimeters (range, nine to fourteen millimeters) in the group treated with reaming and 9.2 millimeters (range, eight to ten millimeters) in the group treated without reaming. Follow-up information was adequate for forty-five patients (forty-seven fractures) who had been managed with reaming and forty patients (forty-one fractures) who had been managed without reaming. No clinically important differences were found between the two groups with regard to the technical aspects of the procedure or the rate of early postoperative complications. The average time to union was thirty weeks (range, thirteen to seventy-two weeks) in the group treated with reaming and twenty-nine weeks (range, thirteen to fifty weeks) in the group treated without reaming. Four (9 per cent) of the fractures treated with reaming and five (12 per cent) of the fractures treated without reaming did not unite (p = 0.73). There were two infections in the group treated with reaming and one in the group treated without reaming. Significantly more screws broke in the group treated without reaming (twelve; 29 per cent) than in the group treated with reaming (four; 9 per cent) (p = 0.014). There was no difference between the two groups with regard to the frequency of broken nails (two nails that had been inserted after reaming broke, compared with one that had been inserted without reaming). The functional outcome, in terms of pain in the knee, range of motion, return to work, and recreational activity, did not differ significantly between the groups. We concluded that the clinical and radiographic results of nailing after reaming are similar to those of nailing without reaming for fixation of open fractures of the tibial shaft, although more screws broke when reaming had not been done.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baker, S. P., O’Neill, B., Haddon, W. F., & Long, W. B. (1974) · PubMed · Cited by 7,946
BAKER, S. P., OʼNEILL, B., HADDON, W., & LONG, W. B. (1974) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00005373-197403000-00001 · Cited by 7,292
Gustilo, R., & Anderson, J. (1976) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-197658040-00004 · Cited by 3,306
GUSTILO, R. B., & ANDERSON, J. T. (2002) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200204000-00029 · Cited by 2,789
GUSTILO, R. B., MENDOZA, R. M., & WILLIAMS, D. N. (1984) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00005373-198408000-00009 · Cited by 2,383
Tibial Blood Supply in Relation to Fracture Healing
Rhinelander, F. W. (1974) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-197411000-00005 · Cited by 494
The treatment of fractures with a dynamic axial fixator
De Bastiani, G., Aldegheri, R., & Renzi Brivio, L. (1984) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.66b4.6746689 · Cited by 306
Whittle, A. P., Russell, T. A., Taylor, J. C., & Lavelle, D. G. (1992) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199274080-00005 · Cited by 274
Locked intramedullary nailing of open tibial fractures
Court-Brown, C., McQueen, M., Quaba, A., & Christie, J. (1991) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.73b6.1955445 · Cited by 223
Cited by
GOVENDER, S., CSIMMA, C., GENANT, H. K., & VALENTIN-OPRAN, A. (2002) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200212000-00001 · Cited by 1,308
Whelan, D. B., Bhandari, M., Stephen, D., Kreder, H., McKee, M. D., Zdero, R., & Schemitsch, E. H. (2010) · Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care · doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e3181a7c16d · Cited by 428
Autologous Bone Graft: Properties and Techniques
Pape, H. C., Evans, A., & Kobbe, P. (2010) · Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma · doi:10.1097/bot.0b013e3181cec4a1 · Cited by 417
Papakostidis, C., Kanakaris, N. K., Pretel, J., Faour, O., Morell, D. J., & Giannoudis, P. V. (2011) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.015 · Cited by 287
Glatt, V., Evans, C. H., & Tetsworth, K. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00678 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- KEATING, J. F., OʼBRIEN, P. J., BLACHUT, P. A., MEEK, R. N., & BROEKHUYSE, H. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 334-41
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W37591249
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locking Intramedullary Nailing with and without Reaming for Open Fractures of the Tibial Shaft. A Prospective, Randomized Study*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-199703000-00003
- The paper
- KEATING, J. F., OʼBRIEN, P. J., BLACHUT, P. A., MEEK, R. N., & BROEKHUYSE, H. M. (1997). Locking Intramedullary Nailing with and without Reaming for Open Fractures of the Tibial Shaft. A Prospective, Randomized Study*. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199703000-00003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.