Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,789

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PREVENTION OF INFECTION IN THE TREATMENT OF ONE THOUSAND AND TWENTY-FIVE OPEN FRACTURES OF LONG BONES: RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE ANALYSES

GUSTILO, RAMON B., ANDERSON, JOHN T.·2002·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume

Abstract

In 673 open fractures of long bones (tibia and fibula, femur, radius and ulna, and humerus) treated from 1955 to 1968 at Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and analyzed retrospectively, the infection rate was 12 per cent from 1955 to 1960 and 5 per cent from 1961 to 1968. In a prospective study from 1969 to 1973, 352 patients were managed as follows: débridement and copious irrigation, primary closure for Type I and II fractures and secondary closure for Type III fractures, no primary internal fixation except in the presence of associated vascular injuries, cultures of all wounds, and oxacillin-ampicillin before surgery and for three days postoperatively. In 158 of the patients in the prospective study the initial wound cultures revealed bacterial growth in 70.3 per cent and the infection rate was 2.5 per cent. Sensitivity studies suggested that cephalosporin is currently the prophylactic antibiotic of choice. For the Type III open fractures (severe soft-tissue injury, segmental fracture, or traumatic amputation), the infection rates were 44 per cent in the retrospective study and 9 per cent in the prospective study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/00004623-200204000-00029

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,789

Metadata

Authors
GUSTILO, R. B., & ANDERSON, J. T.
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
Published
2002-04
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
682
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146698255
Cited by
2,789
References
0
FWCI
53.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PREVENTION OF INFECTION IN THE TREATMENT OF ONE THOUSAND AND TWENTY-FIVE OPEN FRACTURES OF LONG BONES: RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE ANALYSES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-200204000-00029
The paper
GUSTILO, R. B., & ANDERSON, J. T. (2002). PREVENTION OF INFECTION IN THE TREATMENT OF ONE THOUSAND AND TWENTY-FIVE OPEN FRACTURES OF LONG BONES: RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE ANALYSES. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200204000-00029

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.