Age-Related Changes in the Compressive Strength of Cancellous Bone. The Relative Importance of Changes in Density and Trabecular Architecture*
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Compressive testing to failure in the weight-bearing axis was done on 255 specimens of cancellous bone that had been machined from forty-four femora from human cadavera. The donors had ranged in age from twenty to 102 years at the time of death. After mechanical testing, the apparent density and trabecular architecture were determined. Linear regression analysis showed that the compressive strength decreased by 8.5 per cent each decade (p < 0.001). Apparent density and volume fraction also decreased significantly with age (p < 0.001). Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that the surface-to-volume ratio and the mean separation of the trabecular plate increased with age, whereas the mean thickness and connectivity of the trabecular plate decreased. Both bivariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that age-related changes in apparent density played an important role in the decrease in mechanical strength, accounting for a 92 per cent reduction. Microstructural changes were highly correlated with apparent density and therefore had little independent effect. Thus, similar to the situation with cortical bone, the quantitative changes in aging cancellous-bone tissue, rather than the qualitative changes, influenced the mechanical competence of the bone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides information concerning the difference in the properties of human cancellous bone as a function of age. Because of the importance of changes in apparent density, non-invasive means can be used to estimate the mechanical properties of cancellous bone in vivo. Thus, it may be possible to predict the risk of fracture and to explain further some aspects of the mechanics of fracture in the elderly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both modulus and strength of trabecular bone decrease with age, falling by approximately 10% per decade.
“Both modulus and strength decrease with age, falling by approximately 10% per decade (92, 147).”
From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [147]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 221
- Authors
- McCALDEN, R. W., McGEOUGH, J. A., & COURT-BROWN, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- ORCID
- McCALDEN, RICHARD W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 421-7
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112880618
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
- Keywords
- trabecular bone, age-related bone changes, compressive strength, bone mineral density, trabecular bone microarchitecture, femur, bone microarchitecture, bone mechanical properties
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Bone and Bones, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Mechanical, Bone Density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review