The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AUTOLOGOUS OSTEOCHONDRAL MOSAICPLASTY FOR THE TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS DEFECTS OF WEIGHT-BEARING JOINTS: TEN YEARS OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCE
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The successful treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects of the weight-bearing surfaces is a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Autologous osteochondral transplantation is one method that can be used to create hyaline or hyaline-like repair in the defect area. This paper describes the results after ten years of clinical experience with autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty. METHODS: Clinical scores, imaging techniques, arthroscopy, histological examination of biopsy samples, and cartilage stiffness measurements were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes and quality of the transplanted cartilage in 831 patients undergoing mosaicplasty. RESULTS: According to these investigations, good-to-excellent results were achieved in 92% of the patients treated with femoral condylar implantations, 87% of those treated with tibial resurfacing, 79% of those treated with patellar and/or trochlear mosaicplasties, and 94% of those treated with talar procedures. Long-term donor-site disturbances, assessed with use of the Bandi score, showed that patients had 3% morbidity after mosaicplasty. Sixty-nine of eighty-three patients who were followed arthroscopically showed congruent gliding surfaces, histological evidence of the survival of the transplanted hyaline cartilage, and fibrocartilage filling of the donor sites. Complications of the surgery included four deep infections and thirty-six painful postoperative hemarthroses. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these promising results and those of other similar studies, autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty appears to be an alternative for the treatment of small and medium-sized focal chondral and osteochondral defects of the weight-bearing surfaces of the knee and other weight-bearing synovial joints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The influence of structural design of PLGA/collagen hybrid scaffolds in cartilage tissue engineering
Dai, W., Kawazoe, N., Lin, X., Dong, J., & Chen, G. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.070 · Cited by 248
The osteochondral dilemma: Review of current management and future trends
Ye, K., Di Bella, C., Myers, D. E., & Choong, P. F. M. (2014) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/ans.12108 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- HANGODY, L., & FÜLES, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 25-32
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W133078350
- Cited by
- 1,004
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.