Cited by 44Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

The osteochondral dilemma: Review of current management and future trends

Ye, Ken, Di Bella, Claudia, Myers, Damian E., Choong, Peter F. M.·2014·ANZ Journal of Surgery

Abstract

The management of articular cartilage defects remains challenging and controversial. Hyaline cartilage has limited capacity for self-repair and post-injury cartilage is predominantly replaced by fibrocartilage through healing from the subchondral bone. Fibrocartilage lacks the key properties that characterize hyaline cartilage such as capacity for compression, hydrodynamic permeability and smoothness of the articular surface. Many reports relate compromised function associated with repaired cartilage and loss of function of the articular surface. Novel methods have been proposed with the key aim to regenerate hyaline cartilage for repair of osteochondral defects. Over the past decade, with many exciting developments in tissue engineering and regenerative cell-based technologies, we are now able to consider new combinatorial approaches to overcome the problems associated with osteochondral injuries and damage. In this review, the currently accepted surgical approaches are reviewed and considered; debridement, marrow stimulation, whole tissue transplantation and cellular repair. More recent products, which employ tissue engineering approaches to enhance the traditional methods of repair, are discussed. Future trends must not only focus on recreating the composition of articular cartilage, but more importantly recapitulate the nano-structure of articular cartilage to improve the functional strength and integration of repair tissue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ans.12108

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autologous and allogeneic bone grafts are the most frequently employed clinical techniques for bone repair but have limitations including donor-site defects, immune rejection, and surgical pain.

    “Autologous and allogeneic bone grafts are the most frequently employed clinical techniques [129,130]. However, there are still some limitations to these treatments, such as the risk of creating new defects at the donor site, potential immune rejection, and the pain associated with surgical procedures [131,132].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ye, K., Di Bella, C., Myers, D. E., & Choong, P. F. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Department of Surgery St Vincent's Hospital The University of Melbourne Fitzroy Victoria Australia
Corresponding author
Ye, Ken
Venue
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-04
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
211-217
ISSN
  • 1445-1433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-2197
OpenAlex
W2616710698
Cited by
44
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ANZ Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Zimmer
  • Australian Orthopaedic Association
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
osteochondral defects, articular cartilage repair, hyaline cartilage regeneration, fibrocartilage, subchondral bone, cartilage debridement, bone marrow stimulation, tissue engineering, cartilage biomechanics
MeSH terms
Arthroscopy, Cartilage, Articular, Debridement, Humans, Knee Injuries, Wound Healing, Bone Transplantation, Orthopedic Procedures, Chondrocytes, Tissue Engineering, Hyaline Cartilage, Arthroplasty, Subchondral

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review