The osteochondral dilemma: Review of current management and future trends
Abstract
The management of articular cartilage defects remains challenging and controversial. Hyaline cartilage has limited capacity for self-repair and post-injury cartilage is predominantly replaced by fibrocartilage through healing from the subchondral bone. Fibrocartilage lacks the key properties that characterize hyaline cartilage such as capacity for compression, hydrodynamic permeability and smoothness of the articular surface. Many reports relate compromised function associated with repaired cartilage and loss of function of the articular surface. Novel methods have been proposed with the key aim to regenerate hyaline cartilage for repair of osteochondral defects. Over the past decade, with many exciting developments in tissue engineering and regenerative cell-based technologies, we are now able to consider new combinatorial approaches to overcome the problems associated with osteochondral injuries and damage. In this review, the currently accepted surgical approaches are reviewed and considered; debridement, marrow stimulation, whole tissue transplantation and cellular repair. More recent products, which employ tissue engineering approaches to enhance the traditional methods of repair, are discussed. Future trends must not only focus on recreating the composition of articular cartilage, but more importantly recapitulate the nano-structure of articular cartilage to improve the functional strength and integration of repair tissue.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Autologous and allogeneic bone grafts are the most frequently employed clinical techniques for bone repair but have limitations including donor-site defects, immune rejection, and surgical pain.
“Autologous and allogeneic bone grafts are the most frequently employed clinical techniques [129,130]. However, there are still some limitations to these treatments, such as the risk of creating new defects at the donor site, potential immune rejection, and the pain associated with surgical procedures [131,132].”
From Mussel-Inspired Injectable Adhesive Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications (2024) · cites this paper as [132]
Cites
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-32 · Cited by 1,871 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Askari, M., Afzali Naniz, M., Kouhi, M., Saberi, A., Zolfagharian, A., & Bodaghi, M. (2021) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d0bm00973c · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Wang, B., Liu, J., Niu, D., Wu, N., Yun, W., Wang, W., Zhang, K., Li, G., Yan, S., Xu, G., et al. (2021) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.1c06058 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Mussel-Inspired Injectable Adhesive Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications
Dou, W., Zeng, X., Zhu, S., Zhu, Y., Liu, H., & Li, S. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25169100 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“However, there are still some limitations to these treatments, such as the risk of creating new defects at the donor site, potential immune rejection, and the pain associated with surgical procedures [131,132].”
Background
- Authors
- Ye, K., Di Bella, C., Myers, D. E., & Choong, P. F. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Department of Surgery St Vincent's Hospital The University of Melbourne Fitzroy Victoria Australia
- Corresponding author
- Ye, Ken
- Venue
- ANZ Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-04
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 211-217
- ISSN
- 1445-1433 (ISSN-L)
- 1445-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2616710698
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ANZ Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Zimmer
- Australian Orthopaedic Association
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Keywords
- osteochondral defects, articular cartilage repair, hyaline cartilage regeneration, fibrocartilage, subchondral bone, cartilage debridement, bone marrow stimulation, tissue engineering, cartilage biomechanics
- MeSH terms
- Arthroscopy, Cartilage, Articular, Debridement, Humans, Knee Injuries, Wound Healing, Bone Transplantation, Orthopedic Procedures, Chondrocytes, Tissue Engineering, Hyaline Cartilage, Arthroplasty, Subchondral
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review