Cited by 140Bone and Joint DiseasesHip disorders and treatmentsBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SURVIVORSHIP ANALYSIS AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOME FOLLOWING TANTALUM ROD INSERTION FOR OSTEONECROSIS OF THE FEMORAL HEAD

VEILLETTE, CHRISTIAN J.H., MEHDIAN, HOSSEIN, SCHEMITSCH, EMIL H., MCKEE, MICHAEL D.·2006·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For early stages of osteonecrosis, preservation of the femoral head is the primary objective; however, there has not been a consensus on how best to achieve this goal. Core decompression alone is associated with a lack of structural support with inconsistent outcomes, whereas vascularized fibular grafting requires an extensive surgical procedure with high donor-site morbidity and prolonged rehabilitation. The adjunctive use of a porous tantalum implant offers the advantages of core decompression, structural support, minimally invasive surgery, and no donor-site morbidity. The purpose of this study was to assess the survivorship and to evaluate the clinical results and radiographic outcomes of hips in which osteonecrosis of the femoral head was treated with core decompression and a porous tantalum implant. METHODS: We evaluated fifty-four patients (sixty consecutive hips) in whom osteonecrosis of the femoral head was treated with core decompression and insertion of a porous tantalum implant. Fifty-two patients (fifty-eight hips) were available for follow-up at a mean of twenty-four months. All patients were sixty-five years of age or younger (mean age, thirty-five years). According to the classification system of Steinberg et al., one hip (2%) had stage-I disease, forty-nine hips (84%) had stage-II disease, and eight hips (14%) had stage-III disease. Outcome measures that were used included a limb-specific score (Harris hip score), radiographic outcome measures, an…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/00004623-200611001-00008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 2004, Am J Orthop, 33, 327
  2. 2003, Instr Course Lect, 52, 337
  3. 1996, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 324, 169, 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00020 · DOI
  4. 1991, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 268, 140
  5. 1995, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 77, 870
  6. 1995, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 77, 42
  7. 1995, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77, 674, 10.2106/00004623-199505000-00003 · DOI
  8. 1994, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 306, 17
  9. 1998, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, 56, 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.7989 · DOI
  10. 1999, Can J Surg, 42, 274
  11. 1998, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 80, 1270, 10.2106/00004623-199809000-00004 · DOI
  12. 1995, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77, 681, 10.2106/00004623-199505000-00004 · DOI
  13. 2003, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85, 987, 10.2106/00004623-200306000-00001 · DOI
  14. 1996, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78, 204, 10.2106/00004623-199602000-00006 · DOI
  15. 1998, Microsurgery, 18, 383, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(1998)18:6<383::AID-MICR8>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  16. 1998, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 356, 192, 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00026 · DOI
  17. 1999, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 81, 907, 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.9283 · DOI
  18. 2005, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 441, 30, 10.1097/01.blo.0000194728.62996.2d · DOI
  19. Steinberg, 2004, Orthop Clin North Am, 35, 273, 10.1016/j.ocl.2004.02.005 · DOI
  20. 1994, Instr Course Lect, 43, 513
  21. 1995, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 77, 34
  22. 2001, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 386, 71, 10.1097/00003086-200105000-00009 · DOI
  23. 1999, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 81, 200, 10.2106/00004623-199902000-00007 · DOI
  24. Mont, 2000, Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 26, 279, 10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70139-3 · DOI
  25. 1997, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 334, 91
  26. 1997, J Rheumatol, 24, 654
  27. 1996, Orthopedics, 19, 941, 10.3928/0147-7447-19961101-07 · DOI
  28. 1986, Ann Rheum Dis, 45, 649, 10.1136/ard.45.8.649 · DOI
  29. Garberina, 2004, Orthop Clin North Am, 35, 353, 10.1016/j.ocl.2004.04.002 · DOI
  30. 2003, AIDS, 17, 1, 10.1097/00002030-200301030-00003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
VEILLETTE, C. J. H., MEHDIAN, H., SCHEMITSCH, E. H., & MCKEE, M. D.
Affiliations
St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
Published
2006-11
Volume
88
Issue
suppl_3
Pages
48-55
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101930990
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone and Joint Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Keywords
osteonecrosis of the femoral head, porous tantalum implants, core decompression, hip preservation, survivorship, conversion to total hip arthroplasty, Harris hip score, radiographic outcomes, minimally invasive surgery, donor site morbidity, vascularized fibular graft, early-stage osteonecrosis, chronic systemic disease, total hip arthroplasty
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Femur Head Necrosis, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Tantalum, Survival Analysis, Internal Fixators, Treatment Outcome, Decompression, Surgical, Prosthesis Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review