Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Evaluation of the Effect of the Size of the Resection

Mardones, Rodrigo M., Gonzalez, Carlos, Chen, Qingshan, Zobitz, Mark, Kaufman, Kenton R., Trousdale, Robert T.·2005·The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
DOI 10.2106/jbjs.d.01793
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with symptomatic hip impingement, surgical resection of the femoral head-neck junction may improve the range of motion and relieve pain. A risk of this procedure is fracture. We evaluated the amount of resection of the anterolateral aspect of the femoral head-neck junction that can be done safely. METHODS: Cadaveric proximal femoral specimens (fifteen matched pairs) were divided into three groups: 10%, 30%, or 50% of the diameter of one femoral neck was removed, and the contralateral femoral neck was left intact to serve as the control. A compressive load was applied directly to the femoral head. Peak load, stiffness, and energy to fracture were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The energy to fracture differed significantly (p = 0.0015) among the 10%, 30%, and 50% resection groups. The peak load after the 50% resection was significantly less (p = 0.0025) than that after the 10% or 30% resection. With the numbers available, there was no significant difference in peak load between the 10% and 30% resections. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral quadrant of the head-neck junction did not significantly alter the load-bearing capacity of the proximal part of the femur. However, a 30% resection significantly decreased the amount of energy required to produce a fracture. Thirty percent should be considered to be the greatest feasible amount of resection because of the change in the pattern of the femoral head-neck response to axial loads that we observed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/jbjs.d.01793

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Mardones, R. M., Gonzalez, C., Chen, Q., Zobitz, M., Kaufman, K. R., & Trousdale, R. T.
Venue
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2005-02
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
273-279
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2106/jbjs.d.01793
OpenAlex
W2145583734
Cited by
256
References
29
FWCI
16.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Evaluation of the Effect of the Size of the Resection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/jbjs.d.01793
The paper
Mardones, R. M., Gonzalez, C., Chen, Q., Zobitz, M., Kaufman, K. R., & Trousdale, R. T. (2005). Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Evaluation of the Effect of the Size of the Resection. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.d.01793

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.