CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 101Hip disorders and treatmentsLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesShoulder Injury and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes

Keogh, Michael J., Batt, Mark E.·2008·Sports Medicine
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200838100-00005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There are a multitude of well recognized hip and groin injuries that commonly affect athletes; however, a more recently recognized and possibly often overlooked cause of hip pain is that of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). FAI is characterized by abutment of the femoral neck against the acetabular rim, which may occur by two mechanisms known as 'CAM' or 'pincer' impingement, although most commonly by a mixture of both. CAM impingement is characterized by abutment of the femoral neck against the acetabulum due to a morphological abnormality of the femoral head-neck junction. Pincer impingement occurs where an abnormality of the acetabulum results in impingement against an often normal femoral neck. Both CAM and pincer impingement are known to result in pathological consequences of cartilage delamination and labral lesions, leading to significant pain and disruption to athletic performance and activities of daily living in athletes. There are currently several methods of assessing the degree of impingement by use of CT and magnetic resonance imaging scans, which can be used in conjunction with magnetic resonance arthrography and arthroscopy to assess the damage caused to the underlying structures of the hip. Both open and arthroscopic surgical methods are used, with recent reports in athletes showing excellent results for lifestyle improvement and frequency of returning to sport. In cases of hip and groin pain in athletes, it is important to remember to look for typical history, and examination and imaging findings that may suggest a diagnosis of hip impingement. This article goes some way to explaining the principles, consequences and management of FAI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00007256-200838100-00005

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased gluteus maximus activation can be achieved through the use of wider stance squats, as well as external band resistance around the thighs.

    “Increased gluteus maximus activation can be achieved through the use of wider stance squats,26–29 as well as external band resistance around the thighs.45,46”

    From A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice. (2024) · cites this paper as [46]

  • External band resistance around the thighs promotes gluteus maximus and gluteus medius activation.

    “Secondary considerations for hip bias squatting early in the recovery process include external band resistance around the thighs to promote gluteus maximus and gluteus medius activation45,46 and avoidance of deep squats (i.e., recommendations highlighted above for PFP).”

    From A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice. (2024) · cites this paper as [46]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Takechi, 1982, Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi, 56, 529
  2. Kim, 1995, Clin Orthop Relat Res, &NA;, 176
  3. Demarais, 1979, Gaz Med France, 86, 2969
  4. Hohle, 1978, Beitr Orthop Traumatol, 25, 261
  5. Van de Velde, 2006, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, 639
  6. Reynolds, 1999, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 81, 281, 10.1302/0301-620X.81B2.0810281 · DOI
  7. Fitzgerald, 1995, Clin Orthop Relat Res, &NA;, 60
  8. Notzli, 2002, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87-B, 1012
  9. Kordelle, 2001, J Pediatr Orthop, 21, 179
  10. Aldrich, 2006, Can Assoc Radiol J, 57, 79
  11. Burman, 1931, J Bone Joint Surg, 23, 669
  12. Mardones, 2005, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, 273

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Keogh, M. J., & Batt, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Sports Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
863-878
ISSN
0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2165/00007256-200838100-00005
OpenAlex
W2070449569
Cited by
101
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Keywords
femoroacetabular impingement, athletes, hip pain, groin pain, cam-type impingement, pincer-type impingement, labral lesions, hip arthroscopy, MR arthrography, hip morphology, return to sport
MeSH terms
Acetabulum, Arthroscopy, Athletic Injuries, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cartilage Diseases, Femur Head, Hip Joint, Humans, Joint Diseases, Hip Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review