Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local Recurrence of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone After Intralesional Treatment with and without Adjuvant Therapy

Knochentumoren, Arbeitsgemeinschaft·2008·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of adjuvants after curettage has been well established for the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone. The purpose of this study was to analyze the rates of recurrence following different types of treatment as well as the influence of various factors of tumor presentation on those rates. METHODS: The data regarding benign giant cell tumors of the appendicular skeleton from ten bone tumor centers were evaluated. Axial and malignant tumors were excluded. The recurrence rates associated with the different treatment modalities were analyzed, and hazard ratios for a recurrence were calculated for multiple factors of tumor presentation. RESULTS: The study included 384 surgical procedures, involving 256 primary and 128 recurrent tumors. The mean duration of follow-up was 64.2 months. Wide excision was performed in seventy-eight cases (20.3%), and an intralesional procedure was done in 306 (79.7%). Of the intralesional procedures, 103 (33.7%) were performed without the use of adjuvants, 102 (33.3%) included filling with polymethylmethacrylate, seventy-four (24.2%) included polymethylmethacrylate filling after phenolization, and twenty-seven (8.8%) included use of local toxins. The overall recurrence rate after the intralesional procedures was 49% when no adjuvants had been used, 22% when polymethylmethacrylate only had been used as an adjuvant, 27% when polymethylmethacrylate had been used after phenolization, and 15% when phenol or other local toxins had been used (without polymethylmethacrylate). The highest rate of recurrence (36%) after curettage with adjuvants was associated with extracompartmental tumors. Recurrent tumors were not at increased risk for another recurrence, even when they were extracompartmental. The recurrence rate following curettage of a primary tumor without the use of adjuvants (55%) was higher than that following the same treatment of a recurrent tumor (39%) (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Use of polymethylmethacrylate as an adjuvant significantly reduces the recurrence rate following intralesional treatment of benign giant cell tumors, and it appears to be the therapy of choice for primary as well as recurrent giant cell tumors of bone. The significantly better results following treatment of recurrent tumors without adjuvants compared with the results of the same treatment of primary tumors were probably related to increased surgical thoroughness brought about by the surgeon's awareness of dealing with a riskier tumor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/jbjs.d.02771

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Knochentumoren, A.
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
Published
2008-05
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
1060-1067
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2414485509
Cited by
373
References
8
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.