The DOI matches its Crossref record.
LONG-TERM OUTCOME AFTER STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF ROTATOR CUFF REPAIRS
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In a previous study, twenty consecutive patients with a rerupture of the rotator cuff, as documented with magnetic resonance imaging, were found to have significantly less pain and better function and strength, compared with the preoperative state, at 3.2 years postoperatively. It was the purpose of this study to determine the clinical and structural outcomes of these reruptures in the same twenty patients after a longer period of follow-up. METHODS: At a mean of 7.6 years postoperatively, the twenty patients were reexamined clinically and with standard radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging with use of the same clinical, radiographic, and magnetic resonance imaging criteria as were utilized in the review at 3.2 years. The mean age at the time of final follow-up was sixty-six years. RESULTS: Nineteen of the twenty patients continued to be either very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome. The relative Constant score averaged 88% and was not significantly different from the score at 3.2 years, which averaged 83%. The mean scores for pain, function, and strength also had not changed significantly. Overall, the twenty reruptures had not increased in size, and eight of them had healed structurally at the time of the 7.6-year follow-up. Seven of these eight reruptures had been of the supraspinatus tendon only, and seven had been smaller than 400 mm(2) at 3.2 years. Twelve reruptures persisted, and five were larger than the preoperative tear. Fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle progressed significantly (p = 0.015) and the acromiohumeral distance decreased significantly (p = 0.006) between the two follow-up periods. Neither fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus and subscapularis muscles nor glenohumeral osteoarthritis progressed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: At an average of 7.6 years, the clinical outcomes after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs remained significantly improved over the preoperative state in terms of pain, function, strength, and patient satisfaction. Overall, the reruptures that had been present at 3.2 years did not increase in size. We also found that reruptures of the supraspinatus that had been smaller than 400 mm(2) had the potential to heal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clinical and Structural Outcomes of Nonoperative Management of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
Zingg, P. O., Jost, B., Sukthankar, A., Buhler, M., Pfirrmann, C. W. A., & Gerber, C. (2007) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200709000-00006 · Cited by 340
Self-citationMaman, E., Harris, C., White, L., Tomlinson, G., Shashank, M., & Boynton, E. (2009) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.g.01335 · Cited by 300
Oh, J. H., Kim, S. H., Kim, J. H., Shin, Y. H., Yoon, J. P., & Oh, C. H. (2009) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.91b12.22481 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- JOST, B., ZUMSTEIN, M., PFIRRMANN, C. W. A., & GERBER, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 472-479
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171895219
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LONG-TERM OUTCOME AFTER STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF ROTATOR CUFF REPAIRS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-200603000-00002
- The paper
- JOST, B., ZUMSTEIN, M., PFIRRMANN, C. W. A., & GERBER, C. (2006). LONG-TERM OUTCOME AFTER STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF ROTATOR CUFF REPAIRS. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200603000-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.