The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lower Extremity-Specific Measures of Disability and Outcomes in Orthopaedic Surgery
Open accessAbstract
Outcome measures may be simple questions or complex measures that assess multiple interrelated domains affecting treatment outcomes. Outcome measures should be relevant to patients, easy to use, reliable, valid, and responsive to clinical changes. Joint and disease-specific outcome measures have been developed for the hip, knee, and foot and ankle. Many of these measures would benefit from further research into their validity, reliability, and optimal applicability. General health measures and activity level scores should be included in outcome assessments after treatment for orthopaedic conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
HARRIS, W. H. (1969) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-196951040-00012 · Cited by 5,640
Banaszkiewicz, P. A. (2014) · Classic Papers in Orthopaedics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_3 · Cited by 5,038
Hudak, P. L., Amadio, P. C., Bombardier, C., Beaton, D., Cole, D., Davis, A., Hawker, G., Katz, J. N., Makela, M., Marx, R. G., et al. (1996) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::aid-ajim4>3.0.co;2-l · Cited by 5,025
Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6 · Cited by 4,982
Rationale, of The Knee Society Clinical Rating System
INSALL, J. N., DORR, L. D., SCOTT, R. D., & NORMAN, W. (1989) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004 · Cited by 4,793
Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries
TEGNER, Y., & LYSHOLM, J. (1985) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-198509000-00007 · Cited by 4,613
Clinical Rating Systems for the Ankle-Hindfoot, Midfoot, Hallux, and Lesser Toes
Kitaoka, H. B., Alexander, I. J., Adelaar, R. S., Nunley, J. A., Myerson, M. S., & Sanders, M. (1994) · Foot & Ankle International · doi:10.1177/107110079401500701 · Cited by 4,477
Cited by
Minimal Clinically Important Differences of 3 Patient-Rated Outcomes Instruments
Sorensen, A. A., Howard, D., Tan, W. H., Ketchersid, J., & Calfee, R. P. (2013) · The Journal of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.032 · Cited by 466
Abbreviated psychologic questionnaires are valid in patients with hand conditions
Bot, A. G. J., Becker, S. J. E., van Dijk, N. C., Ring, D., & Vranceanu, A.-M. (2013) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3213-2 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, M. V., Klein, S. E., Clohisy, J. C., Baca, G. R., Brophy, R. H., & Wright, R. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Published
- 2012-03-07
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 468-477
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-1386
- OpenAlex
- W1978746186
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 125
- FWCI
- 19.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lower Extremity-Specific Measures of Disability and Outcomes in Orthopaedic Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/jbjs.j.01822
- The paper
- Smith, M. V., Klein, S. E., Clohisy, J. C., Baca, G. R., Brophy, R. H., & Wright, R. W. (2012). Lower Extremity-Specific Measures of Disability and Outcomes in Orthopaedic Surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.j.01822
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
