Utility of AAOS OITE Scores in Predicting ABOS Part I Outcomes: AAOS Exhibit Selection
Abstract
Background Residency programs commonly use performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) developed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to identify residents who are lagging behind their peers and at risk for failing Part I of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Certifying Examination. This study was designed to investigate the utility of the OITE score as a predictor of ABOS Part I performance. Method Results for 3132 examinees who took Part I of the ABOS examination for the first time from 2002 to 2006 were matched with records from the 1997 to 2006 OITE tests; at least one OITE score was located for 2852 (91%) of the ABOS Part I examinees. After OITE performance was rescaled to place scores from different test years on comparable scales, descriptive statistics and correlations between ABOS and OITE scores were computed, and regression analyses were conducted to predict ABOS results from OITE performance. Results Substantial increases in the mean OITE score were observed as residents progressed through training. Stronger correlations were observed between OITE and ABOS performance during later years in training, reaching a maximum of 0.53 in years 3 and 4. Logistic regression results indicated that residents with an OITE score below the 10th percentile were much more likely to fail Part I compared with those with an OITE score above the 50th percentile. Conclusions OITE performance was a good predictor of the ABOS score and pas…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination serves as the primary standardized assessment for orthopaedic residents in the United States and a predictor of performance on the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part 1 certifying examination.
“The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE), administered annually by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), serves as the primary standardized assessment for orthopaedic residents in the United States and a predictor of performance on the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgey (ABOS) Part 1 certifying examination (Swanson et al. 2013).”
From Evidence on Demand: OpenEvidence versus Established LLMs on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (2026) · cites this paper as Swanson et al. 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McCrary, H. C., Colbert-Getz, J. M., Poss, W. B., & Smith, B. K. (2021) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-20-00111.1 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Evidence on Demand: OpenEvidence versus Established LLMs on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination
Khan, A. A., Lalvani, S. S., Pourarbab, S., Hyeamang, L. J., Lew, R. M., Hussain, Z. B., Nicholson, G. P., & Garrigues, G. E. (2026) · Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation · doi:10.60118/001c.162882
- Authors
- Swanson, D., Marsh, J. L., Hurwitz, S., DeRosa, G. P., Holtzman, K., Bucak, S. D., Baker, A., & Morrison, C.
- Affiliations
- National Board of Medical Examiners (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e84-1-8
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2206637708
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
- Keywords
- metal-on-metal hip resurfacing, pseudotumor, macrophage infiltration, periprosthetic inflammation, bearing surface wear, foreign body reaction, adaptive immune response
- MeSH terms
- Canada, Certification, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, Internship and Residency, Orthopedics, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review