Cited by 47Orthopaedic implants and arthroplastyOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsMechanical stress and fatigue analysis

Utility of AAOS OITE Scores in Predicting ABOS Part I Outcomes: AAOS Exhibit Selection

Swanson, David, Marsh, J Lawrence, Hurwitz, Shepard, DeRosa, G Paul, Holtzman, Kathleen, Bucak, S Deniz, Baker, Amy, Morrison, Carol·2013·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume

Abstract

Background Residency programs commonly use performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) developed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to identify residents who are lagging behind their peers and at risk for failing Part I of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Certifying Examination. This study was designed to investigate the utility of the OITE score as a predictor of ABOS Part I performance. Method Results for 3132 examinees who took Part I of the ABOS examination for the first time from 2002 to 2006 were matched with records from the 1997 to 2006 OITE tests; at least one OITE score was located for 2852 (91%) of the ABOS Part I examinees. After OITE performance was rescaled to place scores from different test years on comparable scales, descriptive statistics and correlations between ABOS and OITE scores were computed, and regression analyses were conducted to predict ABOS results from OITE performance. Results Substantial increases in the mean OITE score were observed as residents progressed through training. Stronger correlations were observed between OITE and ABOS performance during later years in training, reaching a maximum of 0.53 in years 3 and 4. Logistic regression results indicated that residents with an OITE score below the 10th percentile were much more likely to fail Part I compared with those with an OITE score above the 50th percentile. Conclusions OITE performance was a good predictor of the ABOS score and pas…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/jbjs.l.00457

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination serves as the primary standardized assessment for orthopaedic residents in the United States and a predictor of performance on the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part 1 certifying examination.

    “The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE), administered annually by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), serves as the primary standardized assessment for orthopaedic residents in the United States and a predictor of performance on the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgey (ABOS) Part 1 certifying examination (Swanson et al. 2013).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanson, D., Marsh, J. L., Hurwitz, S., DeRosa, G. P., Holtzman, K., Bucak, S. D., Baker, A., & Morrison, C.
Affiliations
  • National Board of Medical Examiners (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (US)
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
Published
2013-06
Volume
95
Issue
12
Pages
e84-1-8
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2206637708
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Keywords
metal-on-metal hip resurfacing, pseudotumor, macrophage infiltration, periprosthetic inflammation, bearing surface wear, foreign body reaction, adaptive immune response
MeSH terms
Canada, Certification, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, Internship and Residency, Orthopedics, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review