Cited by 49Advanced ceramic materials synthesisPowder Metallurgy Techniques and MaterialsAdvanced materials and composites

A comparative study of different sintering models for Al2O3

Open access
VAN NGUYEN, Chung, SISTLA, Sree Koundinya, VAN KEMPEN, Stanley, GIANG, Ngoc Anh, BEZOLD, Alexander, BROECKMANN, Christoph, LANGE, Friederike·2016·Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan

Abstract

Based on various deformation mechanisms occurring during solid state sintering (pressureless and pressure assisted), a multitude of sintering models have been developed and presented in literature. As reported in literature, most of the simulation results line up well with experimental data. Unfortunately, none of them can be used arbitrarily and none of them are applicable to a generalized case. This paper focuses on a comparative study of three commonly applied models. The first model is based on a physical approach (Riedel) and the other two are phenomenologically based models (the modified Skorohod–Olevsky Viscous Sintering (SOVS) model and a modified Abouaf model). The material models have been implemented through FORTRAN Subroutines used for the FE-Software ABAQUS. The simulation results demonstrate their advantages and disadvantages based on sintering simulations of an aluminum oxide based ceramic cylinder and a bilayer laminate. A guideline to select a suitable model and the adjustment of input parameters under different sintering conditions for general usage is also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2109/jcersj2.15257

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 2) W. Niu and J. Pan, &ldquo;Chapter 4: Computer modelling of sintering: theory and examples,&rdquo; in <i>Sintering of Advanced Materials</i>, Woodhead Publishing (2010) pp. 86&ndash;109.
  2. 6) A. Plankensteiner, C. Feist, C. Grohs, K. Huber and L. Sigl, &ldquo;Numerical assessment of failure-critical stressstates in a powder-compacted bi-material component,&rdquo; in <i>EURO PM Proceedings</i>, Florence (2010).
  3. 11) F. Rasouli, M. Hajaligol and M. E. Counts, &ldquo;Application of neural network for predicting the properties of fabricated sheets based on the properties of metal powders,&rdquo; in <i>Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Powder Metallurgy &amp; Particulate Materials</i>, New York (2000).
  4. 24) Ceramic and Glass Materials Structure, Properties and Processing, Springer US (2008).
  5. 31) C. Van Nguyen, A. Bezold and C. Broeckmann, &ldquo;A combined model to simulate the powder densification during HIP,&rdquo; <i>Proc. Int. Conf. PM 2015; Reims, France, 04.-07.10.2015; Organized by European Powder Metallurgy Association ISBN: 978-1-899072-47-7</i> (2015).
  6. 32) C. Van Nguyen, A. Bezold and C. Broeckmann, &ldquo;Production of Selective Net Shape or Net Shape Components with Support of Numerical HIP simulation&rdquo;.<i>Proc. Int. Conference PM 2014; Salzburg, Austria 21.-24.09.2014; ISBN: 978-1-899072-45-3</i>.
  7. 35) R. Hammerbacher, S. Schmiedeke, I. G&ouml;tschel, A. Roosen and F. Lange, <i>Proc. 57th Intern. Coll. on Refract.</i>, 2014, 178&ndash;182 (2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VAN NGUYEN, C., SISTLA, S. K., VAN KEMPEN, S., GIANG, N. A., BEZOLD, A., BROECKMANN, C., & LANGE, F.
Affiliations
  • IAPK, RWTH Aachen
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Siemens (Germany) (DE)
Venue
Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan
Published
2016
Volume
124
Issue
4
Pages
301-312
ISSN
  • 0914-5400 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-6535
  • 1882-0743
OpenAlex
W2327939583
Cited by
49
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Siemens
  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Advanced materials and composites
Keywords
solid-state sintering, sintering model, alumina, pressure-assisted sintering, pressureless sintering, deformation mechanisms, model comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review