Cited by 37Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

GeneNetwork: framework for web-based genetics

Open access
Sloan, Zachary, Arends, Danny, W. Broman, Karl, Centeno, Arthur, Furlotte, Nicholas, Nijveen, Harm, Yan, Lei, Zhou, Xiang +2 more·2016·The Journal of Open Source Software

Abstract

GeneNetwork (GN) is a free and open source (FOSS) framework for web-based genetics that can be deployed anywhere. GN allows biologists to upload high-throughput experimental data, such as expression data from microarrays and RNA-seq, and also `classic' phenotypes, such as disease phenotypes. These phenotypes can be mapped interactively against genotypes using embedded tools, such as R/QTL (Arends et al. 2010) mapping, interval mapping for model organisms and pylmm; an implementation of FaST-LMM (Lippert et al. 2011) which is more suitable for human populations and outbred crosses, such as the mouse diversity outcross. Interactive D3 graphics are included from R/qtlcharts and presentation-ready figures can be generated. Recently we have added functionality for phenotype correlation (Wang et al. 2016) and network analysis (Langfelder and Horvath 2008).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21105/joss.00025

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Densities of aβ plaques and NeuN+ cells can be estimated in anatomically corrected stereotaxic space using a digital version of direct 3-dimensional counting (optical disector).

    “We can estimate densities of aβ plaques and NeuN+ cells in anatomically corrected stereotaxic space using a digital version of direct 3-dimensional counting, now often referred to as the optical disector23,99.”

    From Magnetic resonance microscopy maps widespread effects of Alzheimer’s disease on brain structures and behavior in mice (2026) · cites this paper as [99]

    The main GeneNetwork section describes web-based genetic mapping and analysis, not anatomical cell or plaque counting. Searches for optical disector, NeuN, amyloid plaques, stereotaxic space, and digital stereology found no passage addressing the claimed method; the copy provides neither support nor a contrary finding. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 4 · Cited by 37

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Arends, D., P. Prins, R. C. Jansen, and K. W. Broman. 2010. "R/qtl: high-throughput multiple QTL mapping." Bioinformatics 26 (23): 2990-2. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq565. · DOI
  2. Langfelder, P., and S. Horvath. 2008. "WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis." BMC Bioinformatics 9: 559. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-559. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Lippert, C., J. Listgarten, Y. Liu, C. M. Kadie, R. I. Davidson, and D. Heckerman. 2011. "FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies." Nat Methods 8 (10): 833-35. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1681. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Wang, X., A. K. Pandey, M. K. Mulligan, E. G. Williams, K. Mozhui, Z. Li, V. Jovaisaite, et al. 2016. "Joint mouse-human phenome-wide association to test gene function and disease risk." Nat Commun 7: 10464. doi:10.1038/ncomms10464. · DOI
  5. Sloan et al., (2016). GeneNetwork: framework for web-based genetics. Journal of Open Source Software, 1(2), 25, doi:10.21105/joss.00025

Authors
Sloan, Z., Arends, D., W. Broman, K., Centeno, A., Furlotte, N., Nijveen, H., Yan, L., Zhou, X., W. Williams, R., & Prins, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Journal of Open Source Software
Published
2016-06-17
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
25
ISSN
2475-9066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2442033574
Cited by
37
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
Type
software paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Open Source Software (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
genome-wide association study, QTL mapping, interval mapping, phenotypic correlation, gene expression data, microarray, RNA-seq, disease phenotypes, network analysis, outbred populations, open source software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review