Cited by 1,209Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies

Lippert, Christoph, Listgarten, Jennifer, Liu, Ying, Kadie, Carl M, Davidson, Robert I, Heckerman, David·2011·Nature Methods

Abstract

We describe factored spectrally transformed linear mixed models (FaST-LMM), an algorithm for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that scales linearly with cohort size in both run time and memory use. On Wellcome Trust data for 15,000 individuals, FaST-LMM ran an order of magnitude faster than current efficient algorithms. Our algorithm can analyze data for 120,000 individuals in just a few hours, whereas current algorithms fail on data for even 20,000 individuals (http://mscompbio.codeplex.com/).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.1681

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SpatialDE is computationally very efficient.

    “Leveraging efficient inference methods previously developed for linear mixed models11, and taking advantage of the data structure from massively parallel molecular assays, SpatialDE is computationally very efficient (Methods, Supp. Fig. 2).”

    From SpatialDE: identification of spatially variable genes (2018) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lippert, C., Listgarten, J., Liu, Y., Kadie, C. M., Davidson, R. I., & Heckerman, D.
Affiliations
Microsoft (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lippert, Christoph
  • Listgarten, Jennifer
  • Heckerman, David
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2011-09-04
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
833-835
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2079927753
Cited by
1,209
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 15
FWCI
23.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (085475, 076113)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U10AA008401)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
linear mixed models, genome-wide association study, computational scalability, memory efficiency, computation time reduction, spectral transformation, genetic association
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Models, Genetic, Software, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review