Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PySwarms: a research toolkit for Particle Swarm Optimization in Python

Open access
James V. Miranda, Lester·2018·The Journal of Open Source Software

Abstract

Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is a heuristic search technique that iteratively improves a set of candidate solutions given an objective measure of fitness (Kennedy and Eberhart 1995b). Although vanilla implementations of PSO can be found in some Python evolutionary algorithm toolboxes (Fortin et al. 2012; Biscani, Izzo, and Märtens 2017), a PSO-specific library that focuses on the said technique is still an open challenge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21105/joss.00433

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
James V. Miranda, L.
Venue
The Journal of Open Source Software
Published
2018-01-10
Volume
3
Issue
21
Pages
433
ISSN
2475-9066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2783515600
Cited by
343
References
1
Type
software paper
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PySwarms: a research toolkit for Particle Swarm Optimization in Python. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21105/joss.00433
The paper
James V. Miranda, L. (2018). PySwarms: a research toolkit for Particle Swarm Optimization in Python. The Journal of Open Source Software. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00433

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.