Cited by 15Structural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesVibration and Dynamic Analysis

Dynamic characterization of timber floor subassemblies: Sensitivity analysis and modeling issues

Open access
Pasca, Dag Pasquale, Aloisio, Angelo, Fragiacomo, Massimo, Tomasi, Roberto·2021·Journal of Structural Engineering

Abstract

Timber floors are prone to exhibit vibration levels, which can cause discomfort to the occupants. In the last 20 years, ambient vibration tests have become very popular due to the many advantages they have over traditional forced vibration tests when dealing with civil engineering structures. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses and black-box” optimization algorithms can support the development of refined finite-element models that accurately predict the structures’ responses based on the experimental modal parameters. However, applications of these methods and techniques to timber structures are scarce compared with traditional materials. This paper presents and discusses the findings of an experimental testing campaign on a lightweight timber floor. At first, each component of the assembly was tested separately under different boundary conditions. Then, the authors evaluated the behavior of the whole floor assembly. In a second step, the authors carried out a covariance-based sensitivity analysis of finite element (FE) models representative of the tested structures by varying the different members’ mechanical properties. The results of the sensitivity analysis highlighted the most influential parameters and supported the comparison among diverse FE models. As expected, the longitudinal modulus of elasticity is the most critical parameter, although the results are very dependent on the boundary conditions. Then automatic modal updating algorithms tuned the numerical model to te…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003179

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pasca, D. P., Aloisio, A., Fragiacomo, M., & Tomasi, R.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
  • University of L'Aquila (IT)
Corresponding author
Pasca, Dag Pasquale
Venue
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2021-12
Volume
147
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0733-9445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-541X
OpenAlex
W3204690422
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Structural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
Keywords
ambient vibration testing, finite element model updating, modal updating, natural frequency estimation, boundary conditions, elastic modulus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review