The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
comorbidity: An R package for computing comorbidity scores
Open accessAbstract
Comorbidity scores are extensively used in observational medical research studies to avoid potential bias when the burden of disease could be confounding the association of interest. This is of primary importance, given the increasing availability and use of administrative data (such as medical records and insurance claims) for research purposes. Several comorbidity scores have been proposed throughout the years; however, two of them are used most frequently in practice: the Charlson comorbidity index (Charlson et al. 1987) and the Elixhauser comorbidity index (Elixhauser et al. 1998). The Charlson comorbidity index defines a set of comorbid conditions using International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnostic codes. Each comorbid condition has an associated weight, and the sum of all weights results in a single comorbidity score per patient. The current version of the Charlson score includes 17 comorbidities. Similarly, the Elixhauser comorbidity index is based on ICD diagnostic codes and includes 31 comorbidities. In origin, the Elixhauser index score was based on the cumulative number of conditions present; since then, several weighting systems accounting for the increase or decrease in mortality risk associated with each condition have been proposed and used in practice (van Walraven et al. 2009; Moore et al. 2017).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data
Quan, H., Sundararajan, V., Halfon, P., Fong, A., Burnand, B., Luthi, J.-C., Saunders, L. D., Beck, C. A., Feasby, T. E., & Ghali, W. A. (2005) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 · Cited by 10,669
Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.
Elixhauser, A., Steiner, C., Harris, D. R., & Coffey, R. M. (1998) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004 · Cited by 9,921
van Walraven, C., Austin, P. C., Jennings, A., Quan, H., & Forster, A. J. (2009) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31819432e5 · Cited by 2,200
Moore, B. J., White, S., Washington, R., Coenen, N., & Elixhauser, A. (2017) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000000735 · Cited by 827
Menendez, M. E., Neuhaus, V., van Dijk, N. C., & Ring, D. (2014) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3686-7 · Cited by 531
Cited by
Opioid use in cancer patients compared with noncancer pain patients in a veteran population
Mudumbai, S. C., He, H., Chen, J.-Q., Kapoor, A., Regala, S., Mariano, E. R., Stafford, R. S., Abnet, C. C., Pfeiffer, R. M., Freedman, N. D., et al. (2024) · JNCI Cancer Spectrum · doi:10.1093/jncics/pkae012 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Gasparini, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Open Source Software
- Publisher
- The Open Journal
- Published
- 2018-03-29
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 648
- ISSN
- 2475-9066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794452209
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: comorbidity: An R package for computing comorbidity scores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21105/joss.00648
- The paper
- Gasparini, A. (2018). comorbidity: An R package for computing comorbidity scores. Journal of Open Source Software. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.