Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 533

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

sumo: Command-line tools for plotting and analysis of periodic ab initio calculations

Open access
M Ganose, Alex, J Jackson, Adam, O Scanlon, David·2018·Journal of Open Source Software

Abstract

Ab initio electronic structure modelling is capable of providing an insight into the fundamental properties of solid-state materials, at a resolution beyond that of experimental techniques.The optoelectronic properties of a compound are analysed through several key descriptions, including: density-of-states distributions, which provide information on the orbital character of bonding; band structure diagrams, which indicate carrier transport properties; and optical absorption spectra, which are used to assess the wavelengths of light a material will transmit or absorb.An understanding of these fundamental properties is crucial when selecting or optimising materials for particular applications, including photovoltaics (Ganose, Savory, & Scanlon, 2017), transparent conductors (Ganose & Scanlon, 2016), and thermoelectrics (Gorai, Stevanović, & Toberer, 2017).Most common ab initio calculation software for analysing crystalline materials with periodic boundary condictions, such as Vienna ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) (Kresse & Furthmüller, 1996) and Quantum Espresso (Giannozzi et al., 2009), write raw data which require post-processing to plot or convert into a human-readable format.Several packages exist that facilitate the creation and plotting of such diagrams.Python libraries, such as Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen) (Ong et al., 2013) and Atomic Simulation Environment (ase) (Larsen et al., 2017), provide powerful interfaces for plotting and data analysis but require the user to be proficient in Python to use effectively.Conversely, programs which provide a graphical user interface, such as p4vasp (Dubay, 2018) and XCrySDen (Kokalj, 1999), are easy to use but are not conducive to working on the command line.The purpose of this package is to provide an intermediate solution that is trivial to use but still provides the flexibility needed for a broad range of analysis modes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21105/joss.00717

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 533

Metadata

Authors
M Ganose, A., J Jackson, A., & O Scanlon, D.
Venue
Journal of Open Source Software
Published
2018-08-07
Volume
3
Issue
28
Pages
717
ISSN
2475-9066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886249949
Cited by
533
References
8
FWCI
13.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: sumo: Command-line tools for plotting and analysis of periodic ab initio calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21105/joss.00717
The paper
M Ganose, A., J Jackson, A., & O Scanlon, D. (2018). sumo: Command-line tools for plotting and analysis of periodic ab initio calculations. Journal of Open Source Software. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00717

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.