Cited by 3Student Assessment and FeedbackScience Education and PedagogyHigher Education Learning Practices

Fostering Stem Formative Assessment for Lifelong Learners

Finamore, Anna Carolina, Moura Santos, Ana, Ribeiro, Pedro·2016·ICERI proceedings

Abstract

Appears in: ICERI2016 Proceedings Publication year: 2016Pages: 152-159ISBN: 978-84-617-5895-1ISSN: 2340-1095doi: 10.21125/iceri.2016.1031Conference name: 9th annual International Conference of Education, Research and InnovationDates: 14-16 November, 2016Location: Seville, Spain

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21125/iceri.2016.1031

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finamore, A. C., Moura Santos, A., & Ribeiro, P.
Venue
ICERI proceedings
Publisher
IATED
Published
2016-11
Volume
1
Pages
152-159
ISSN
2340-1095 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2558323089
Cited by
3
References
11
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ICERI proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Learning Practices
Keywords
STEM education, formative assessment, lifelong learning, assessment for learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review