The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sources of Lead in the San Cristobal, Pulacayo, and Potosi Mining Districts, Bolivia, and a Reevaluation of Regional Ore Lead Isotope Provinces
Abstract
New lead isotope data on ores, crustal rocks, and leachates of crustal rocks, combined with data in the literature, provide important new constraints on the sources of ore metals in southwest to south-central Bolivia, including the very large recently discovered silver-zinc deposit at San Cristobal, the Pulacayo polymetallic district, and the giant Potosi silver-tin-base metal deposit. Lead isotope ratios of ores and igneous rocks from the San Cristobal deposit and from Paleozoic and Cretaceous sedimentary rocks are compared with published data on high-grade Middle Proterozoic metamorphic basement rocks. These data constrain the major source of lead, and by inference of other ore metals, at San Cristobal to be the metamorphic basement rocks. Leaching experiments on samples of Paleozoic and Cretaceous sedimentary rocks show that the easily leachable lead from these rocks is much less radiogenic than the whole-rock compositions. However, lead isotope ratios of both whole rocks and leachates of these upper crustal rocks are too radiogenic for them to be major sources of ore lead at San Cristobal. Lead isotope ratios of ores from Pulacayo and Potosi are similar to each other and lie within the range of Paleozoic and Cretaceous sedimentary whole-rock compositions. Leaching of Pb from the sedimentary rocks cannot explain the isotopic compositions of the Pulacayo and Potosi ores, and the isotopic homogeneity of the Potosi ores also argues against mixing of lead from diverse sources…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contamination of igneous rocks by varying kinds of crustal material or oceanic sediments contributes to heavy isotope signatures that differ sharply even within seemingly geologically similar regions.
“The contamination of igneous rocks by varying kinds of crustal material or oceanic sediments (Klerkx, et al., 1977) contribute to heavy isotope signatures that differ sharply even within seemingly geologically-similar regions”
From An archaeological strontium isoscape for the prehistoric andes: understanding population mobility through a geostatistical meta-analysis of archaeological 87Sr/86Sr values from humans, animals, and artifacts (2020) · cites this paper as Kamenov, et al., 2002
Citations
Cites
Uplift of the Central Andean Plateau and bending of the Bolivian Orocline
Isacks, B. L. (1988) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb093ib04p03211 · Cited by 1,113
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scaffidi, B. K., & Knudson, K. J. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2020.105121 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamenov, G.
- Venue
- Economic Geology
- Publisher
- Society of Economic Geologists
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 573-592
- ISSN
- 0361-0128
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review