Cited by 100Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisMineralogy and Gemology Studies

Silica-carbonate alteration of serpentine: wall rock alteration in mercury Deposits of the California Coast Ranges

Barnes, Ivan, O'Neill, James R., Rapp, John B., White, Donald E.·1973·Economic Geology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2113/gsecongeo.68.3.388

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the δ18O value of Franciscan Formation waters (3.14‰), Red Mountain fluid is calculated to be a mixture of up to 84 ± 14% meteoric water and 16 ± 14% Franciscan Formation water.

    “Using the d 18 O value (3.14 ‰ ) of waters hosted in the Franciscan Formation (Barnes et al., 1973), we obtain a mixture of up to 84 ± 14% meteoric water and 16 ± 14% Franciscan Formation water.”

    From Clumped-isotope thermometry of magnesium carbonates in ultramafic rocks (2016) · cites this paper as Barnes et al., 1973

  • These calculated δ18O compositions agree with the modern range of meteoric water δ18O for California.

    “These compositions agree with the modern range of meteoric water d 18 O compositions for California ( cf. White et al., 1973; Barnes et al., 1973; Kendall and Coplen, 2001; Blank et al., 2009).”

    From Clumped-isotope thermometry of magnesium carbonates in ultramafic rocks (2016) · cites this paper as Barnes et al., 1973

  • Calculated δ18Ofluid compositions at McLaughlin, Del Puerto, and New Idria agree with the range of meteoric water δ18O compositions for California and exhibit relative depletion in 18O from north to south.

    “Calculated d 18 Ofluid compositions ( 4.7 ± 0.1 ‰ at McLaughlin; 5.8 ± 0.2 ‰ at Del Puerto; and 6.5 ± 0.1 ‰ at New Idria; Table 3) agree with the range of meteoric water d 18 O compositions for California (Fig. 10b; cf. Barnes et al., 1973; White et al., 1973; Kendall and Coplen, 2001; Blank et al., 2009) and exhibit relative depletion in 18 Ofrom north to south.”

    From Clumped-isotope thermometry of magnesium carbonates in ultramafic rocks (2016) · cites this paper as Barnes et al., 1973

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, I., O'Neill, J. R., Rapp, J. B., & White, D. E.
Venue
Economic Geology
Published
1973-05-01
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
388-398
ISSN
  • 0361-0128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-0774
OpenAlex
W2124677594
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Economic Geology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
Keywords
wall rock alteration, mercury deposits, California Coast Ranges, hydrothermal alteration, mineral deposits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review