The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticles for Remediation: Solving Big Problems with Little Particles
Abstract
Remediation with engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) promises more effective and cheaper approaches than conventional methods due to the increased reactivity of nanoparticles and the possibility of in situ treatment. Three examples of the use of ENMs in soil remediation are nanoscale zero-valent iron for the degradation of halogenated organic compounds, nanoscale calcium peroxide for the destruction of organics (e.g. gasoline) and nanoscale metal oxides for the adsorption of metals. However, these methods are very new, and more research is needed on the mobility of ENMs in the soil and their impact on the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview
Zhang, W.-X. (2003) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025520116015 · Cited by 2,003
Cited by
Review on nano zerovalent iron (nZVI): From synthesis to environmental applications
Stefaniuk, M., Oleszczuk, P., & Ok, Y. S. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.046 · Cited by 935
Chemical stabilization of metals and arsenic in contaminated soils using oxides–a review
Komárek, M., Vaněk, A., & Ettler, V. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2012.07.045 · Cited by 602
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, N. C., & Nowack, B.
- Venue
- Elements
- Publisher
- Mineralogical Society of America
- Published
- 2010-12-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 395-400
- ISSN
- 1811-5209 (ISSN-L)
- 1811-5217
- OpenAlex
- W1975290563
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
