Cited by 7Petroleum Processing and AnalysisSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques

Developing New Surfactant Chemistry for Breaking Emulsions in Heavy Oil

Temple-Heald, Clare, Davies, Craig, Wilson, Natalie, Readman, Nicola·2014·Journal of Petroleum Technology

Abstract

Technology Update A critical part of any oilfield production processing is oil and water separation. Although some highly effective demulsifier products for this purpose have been developed for a number of production scenarios, the application of demulsifiers to “heavy” oils remains problematic. However, the work described below has led to the development of a tailored range of demulsifiers to add to the relatively small number of effective chemistries applicable across the growing demands of heavy oil production activity. Theoretical models show that the critical parameters of how chemical demulsifiers break crude oil emulsions are associated with the rheology of the oil/water interface. The work undertaken was to determine whether such correlations are justified in real systems by measuring the rheological parameters associated with the oil/water interface and correlating them with demulsifier performance. The principle of this model was then used to design more efficient demulsifier molecules. All demulsifiers were evaluated individually for comparison and not as a demulsifier blended package. To meet the needs of field applications, the desired demulsifiers must be very interfacially active and be able to displace the surfactants in crude oil at a use concentration as low as 10 ppm. A range of novel heavy oil demulsifiers has been developed with a wide demulsification chemistry portfolio, including resins, polymerics, and esters to optimize and further develop more efficient molecules. Experimental Work Interfacial Tension (IFT). Demulsifiers that showed good performance in the IFT testing were further evaluated in a range of crude oils with a range of API gravities, water cuts, compositions, and regions of origin. Relative Solubility Number (RSN). The relative solubility number of a demulsifier is a measure of its solubility properties. This is a key factor in demulsifier selection, because solubility properties dictate whether the chemical will perform effectively as a surfaceactive agent at the oil/water interface. The following physical properties, pour point, viscosity, density, and pH, were measured to provide an indication of how the products could be handled in the field. Turbiscan Analysis. A Turbiscan laboratory instrument, which replicates onfield bottle testing, was used to evaluate the demulsifiers. This method enables the acceleration and documentation of an aging test for an in-depth understanding of the destabilization mechanisms (creaming, sedimentation, flocculation, and coalescence) of emulsions. Results and Discussion A list of the initial chemistries and their physical properties is shown in Table 1. To establish information regarding the equilibrium adsorption of the demulsifier materials at the oil/water interface, the IFT (mN/m) was measured over time (sec) for the demulsifiers. Figs. 1 and 2 show the IFT analysis for the demulsifiers listed in Table 1. The graphs show that the steeper the gradient, the faster acting the demulsifier, and the lower the equilibrium IFT, the more effective the demulsifier.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2118/0114-0030-jpt

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RSN of a demulsifier is a key factor in demulsifier selection because solubility properties dictate whether the chemical will perform effectively as a surface-active agent at the oil/water interface.

    “Temple-Heald et al. reported that because the RSN of a demulsifier is a measure of its solubility properties, it is a key factor in demulsifier selection because solubility properties dictate whether the chemical will perform effectively as a surface-active agent at the oil/water interface.”
  • All demulsifiers with RSN < 8 did not exhibit any separation whilst surfactants with RSN > 11 showed an improvement in the emulsion separation.

    “In terms of the RSN evaluation, all demulsifiers < 8 RSN did not exhibit any separation whilst surfactants with RSN > 11 showed an improvement in the emulsion separation.”
  • Products with highly mixed alkoxylation levels had better demulsification properties than single alkoxylated products.

    “In terms of the level of alkoxylation levels, the products that had highly mixed alkoxylation levels had better demulsification properties than single alkoxylated products (Temple-Heald et al., 2014).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Temple-Heald, C., Davies, C., Wilson, N., & Readman, N.
Affiliations
Croda Europe
Venue
Journal of Petroleum Technology
Published
2014-01-01
Volume
66
Issue
01
Pages
30-36
ISSN
  • 0149-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-978X
OpenAlex
W2007424486
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Petroleum Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Petroleum Processing and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Keywords
crude oil emulsions, oil-water separation, interfacial rheology, interfacial tension, emulsion destabilization, surfactant displacement, heavy oil production, API gravity, water cut

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review