The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of the Potential for Gas and CO2 Leakage Along Wellbores
Abstract
Summary: Implementation of carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in geological media requires a proper assessment of the risk of CO2 leakage from storage sites. Leakage pathways may exist through and along wellbores, which may penetrate or be near to the storage site. One method of assessing the potential for CO2 leakage through wells is by mining databases that usually reside with regulatory agencies. These agencies collect data concerning wellbore construction, oil and gas production, and other regulated issues for existing wells. The Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB), the regulatory agency in Alberta, Canada, collects and stores information about more than 315,000 oil, gas, and injection wells in the province of Alberta. The ERCB also records well leakage at the surface as surface-casing-vent flow (SCVF) through wellbore annuli and gas migration (GM) outside casing, as reported by the industry. The evaluation of a leakage pathway through wellbore casing or annuli and what causes these wellbore leaks are the first step in determining what factors may contribute to wellbore leakage from CO2-storage sites. By using available data, major factors that contribute to wellbore leakage were identified. Data analysis shows that there is a correlation between these SCVF/GM and economic activity, technology changes, geographic location, and regulatory changes regarding well completion and abandonment. Further analysis indicates a relationship between low-annular-cement top, external corrosion, casing failure, and wellbore leakage (SCVF/GM). Other factors that could affect the presence of wellbore leakage, such as wellbore deviation, surface-casing depth, and wellbore density, were also investigated. This paper presents the findings of the data analysis and a method to evaluate the potential for leakage along wells in an area where CO2 storage is intended. This information is useful not only for future operations of CO2 storage in geological media, but also for current operations relating to the exploration and production of hydrocarbons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies
Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 · Cited by 3,198
Choi, Y.-S., Young, D., Nešić, S., & Gray, L. G. S. (2013) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.028 · Cited by 157
Mason, H. E., Du Frane, W. L., Walsh, S. D. C., Dai, Z., Charnvanichborikarn, S., & Carroll, S. A. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3039906 · Cited by 128
Isotopic signatures of anthropogenic CH4 sources in Alberta, Canada
Lopez, M., Sherwood, O. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Kessler, R., Giroux, L., & Worthy, D. E. J. (2017) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.021 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, T. L., & Bachu, S.
- Venue
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publisher
- Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 115-126
- ISSN
- 1064-6671 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-0204
- OpenAlex
- W2148324673
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the Potential for Gas and CO2 Leakage Along Wellbores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2118/106817-pa
- The paper
- Watson, T. L., & Bachu, S. (2009). Evaluation of the Potential for Gas and CO2 Leakage Along Wellbores. SPE Drilling & Completion. https://doi.org/10.2118/106817-pa
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.