Cited by 128CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsDrilling and Well EngineeringConcrete and Cement Materials Research

Chemical and Mechanical Properties of Wellbore Cement Altered by CO2-Rich Brine Using a Multianalytical Approach

Mason, Harris E., Du Frane, Wyatt L., Walsh, Stuart D.C., Dai, Zurong, Charnvanichborikarn, Supakit, Carroll, Susan A.·2013·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Defining chemical and mechanical alteration of wellbore cement by CO(2)-rich brines is important for predicting the long-term integrity of wellbores in geologic CO(2) environments. We reacted CO(2)-rich brines along a cement-caprock boundary at 60 °C and pCO(2) = 3 MPa using flow-through experiments. The results show that distinct reaction zones form in response to reactions with the brine over the 8-day experiment. Detailed characterization of the crystalline and amorphous phases, and the solution chemistry show that the zones can be modeled as preferential portlandite dissolution in the depleted layer, concurrent calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) alteration to an amorphous zeolite and Ca-carbonate precipitation in the carbonate layer, and carbonate dissolution in the amorphous layer. Chemical reaction altered the mechanical properties of the core lowering the average Young's moduli in the depleted, carbonate, and amorphous layers to approximately 75, 64, and 34% of the unaltered cement, respectively. The decreased elastic modulus of the altered cement reflects an increase in pore space through mineral dissolution and different moduli of the reaction products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es3039906

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mason, H. E., Du Frane, W. L., Walsh, S. D. C., Dai, Z., Charnvanichborikarn, S., & Carroll, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
  • Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, California 94551, United States
Corresponding author
Mason, Harris E.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2013-01-11
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
1745-1752
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2333732274
Cited by
128
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
wellbore cement, CO2-rich brine, CO2 geological storage, portlandite dissolution, zeolite synthesis, calcium carbonate precipitation, carbonate dissolution, Young's modulus, elastic properties, pore space, flow-through experiments
MeSH terms
Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Construction Materials, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Powders, Salts, Solutions, X-Ray Diffraction, Nanotechnology, Mechanical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review