Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 514

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Shale Properties on Pore Structure and Storage Characteristics

Bustin, R. M., Bustin, A. M. M., Cui, X., Ross, D. J. K., Pathi, V. S. Murthy·2008·SPE Shale Gas Production Conference

Abstract

Characterising the pore structure of gas shales is of critical importance to establish the original gas in place and flow characteristics of the rock matrix. Methods of measuring pore volume, pore size distribution, and sorptive capacity of shales, inherited from the coalbed methane and conventional reservoir rock analyses, although widely applied, are of limited value in characterising many shales Helium which is routinely used to measure shale skeletal and grain density, permeability and diffusivity, has greater access to the fine pore structure of shale than larger molecules such as methane. Utilizing gases other than He to measure porosity or flux requires corrections for sorption to be incorporated in the analyses. Since the permeability of shales vary by several orders of magnitude with effective stress, methods that do not consider effective stress such as crushed permeability, permeability from Hg porosimetry, and from desorption are of limited utility and may be at best instructional. For shales investigated to date, clay-rich rocks have higher porosity and permeability than biogenic silica-rich shales or carbonate-rich shales. Shales rich in detrital quartz have higher porosity and permeability than shales rich in biogenic quartz and hence simply knowing the mineralogy of a shale may not be diagnostic. The porosity of most shales is mainly dependent on the degree of pore volume development in pores less than 10 um. Quantifying total gas in place in shales by much of the industry using coal desorption methods and porosity and water saturation determinations, developed for conventional reservoir rocks, may lead to substantial errors. Canister ‘desorption' methods applied to gas shales routinely captures free and solution gas as well as sorbed gas which, if considered as only sorbed gas, results in a significant overestimation of gas in place. A proprietary method of analyses, referred to as MARIO, results in rigorous total gas in place determinations that avoids errors including those associated with molecular sieving and provides a maximum value of the sorbed gas contribution to total gas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2118/119892-ms

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 514

Metadata

Authors
Bustin, R. M., Bustin, A. M. M., Cui, X., Ross, D. J. K., & Pathi, V. S. M.
Venue
SPE Shale Gas Production Conference
Publisher
SPE
Published
2008-11-16
OpenAlex
W2037041665
Cited by
514
References
1
FWCI
25.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Shale Properties on Pore Structure and Storage Characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2118/119892-ms
The paper
Bustin, R. M., Bustin, A. M. M., Cui, X., Ross, D. J. K., & Pathi, V. S. M. (2008). Impact of Shale Properties on Pore Structure and Storage Characteristics. SPE Shale Gas Production Conference. https://doi.org/10.2118/119892-ms

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.