Cited by 3Flow Measurement and AnalysisOil and Gas Production TechniquesOffshore Engineering and Technologies

Statistical Analysis of Effect of Sensor Degradation and Heat Transfer Modeling on Multiphase Flowrate Estimates from a Virtual Flow Meter

Bikmukhametov, Timur, Stanko, Milan, Jäschke, Johannes·2018·SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition

Abstract

Accurate flowrate measurements in petroleum production systems are important for optimization, fiscal metering, and production allocation. Sometimes, Virtual Flow Meters (VFMs) are used for this purpose instead of physical meters to reduce cost. These systems estimate the flowrates using a computational model that represents accurately the production system of interest. Since VFM systems mostly rely on pressure and temperature measurements, it is important to understand how accuracy and degradation of sensors influence the VFM flowrate estimates. In this work, a VFM system for a subsea oil well was created using a transient multiphase model built in a commercial software and controlled from an external computational routine. A statistical analysis of VFM simulation results was performed to quantify the effect of pressure sensors degradation on the VFM flowrate estimates. In addition, the effect of temperature matching and a segmented approach to represent the well heat transfer were evaluated. The analysis showed that the sensor degradation effect should be considered in VFM systems carefully, especially if a high estimation accuracy is required. Measurement drift was found to be the most critical factor of the sensor degradation but high measurement noise can also cause considerable errors of the flowrate estimates. In addition, it was found that a complex representation of the wellbore heat transfer is not required to obtain accurate flowrate predictions and simplified models can be used instead.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2118/191962-ms

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensor degradation is a complex phenomenon driven by a variety of physical and chemical conditions, and is highly dependent on the sensor type and its operational environment.

    “The degradation of sensors is a complex phenomenon driven by a variety of physical and chemical conditions, and are highly dependent on the sensor type and its operational environment.”

    From Impact of Sensor Degradation on Measurement Uncertainty in Prognostics and Maintenance Decision-Making: (2025) · cites this paper as Bikmukhametov, Stanko and Jäschke, 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bikmukhametov, T., Stanko, M., & Jäschke, J.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition
Publisher
SPE
Published
2018-10-23
OpenAlex
W2896887026
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Flow Measurement and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Oil and Gas Production Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Offshore Engineering and Technologies
Keywords
virtual flow meter, sensor degradation, wellbore heat transfer, measurement noise, temperature matching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review