The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Markers in Patients with Chronic Wounds to Guide Surgical Debridement
Open accessAbstract
Chronic wounds, such as venous ulcers, are characterized by physiological impairments manifested by delays in healing, resulting in severe morbidity. Surgical debridement is routinely performed on chronic wounds because it stimulates healing. However, procedures are repeated many times on the same patient because, in contrast to tumor excision, there are no objective biological/molecular markers to guide the extent of debridement. To develop bioassays that can potentially guide surgical debridement, we assessed the pathogenesis of the patients' wound tissue before and after wound debridement. We obtained biopsies from three patients at two locations, the nonhealing edge (prior to debridement) and the adjacent, nonulcerated skin of the venous ulcers (post debridement), and evaluated their histology, biological response to wounding (migration) and gene expression profile. We found that biopsies from the nonhealing edges exhibit distinct pathogenic morphology (hyperproliferative/hyperkeratotic epidermis; dermal fibrosis; increased procollagen synthesis). Fibroblasts deriving from this location exhibit impaired migration in comparison to the cells from adjacent nonulcerated biopsies, which exhibit normalization of morphology and normal migration capacity. The nonhealing edges have a specific, identifiable, and reproducible gene expression profile. The adjacent nonulcerated biopsies have their own distinctive reproducible gene expression profile, signifying that particular wound areas can be identified by gene expression profiling. We conclude that chronic ulcers contain distinct subpopulations of cells with different capacity to heal and that gene expression profiling can be utilized to identify them. In the future, molecular markers will be developed to identify the nonimpaired tissue, thereby making surgical debridement more accurate and more efficacious.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bergan, J. J., Schmid-Schönbein, G. W., Smith, P. D. C., Nicolaides, A. N., Boisseau, M. R., & Eklof, B. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra055289 · Cited by 933
Molecular Pathogenesis of Chronic Wounds
Stojadinovic, O., Brem, H., Vouthounis, C., Lee, B., Fallon, J., Stallcup, M., Merchant, A., Galiano, R. D., & Tomic-Canic, M. (2005) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62953-7 · Cited by 365
Self-citationThe “trap” hypothesis of venous ulceration
Falanga, V., & Eaglstein, W. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)91085-z · Cited by 330
Cited by
Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation
Eming, S. A., Martin, P., & Tomic-Canic, M. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337 · Cited by 3,562
Self-citationHuman skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy
Sen, C. K., Gordillo, G. M., Roy, S., Kirsner, R., Lambert, L., Hunt, T. K., Gottrup, F., Gurtner, G. C., & Longaker, M. T. (2009) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2009.00543.x · Cited by 2,965
Nunan, R., Harding, K. G., & Martin, P. (2014) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.016782 · Cited by 542
Dynamic reciprocity in the wound microenvironment
Schultz, G. S., Davidson, J. M., Kirsner, R. S., Bornstein, P., & Herman, I. M. (2011) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2011.00673.x · Cited by 490
Brem, H., Kodra, A., Golinko, M. S., Entero, H., Stojadinovic, O., Wang, V. M., Sheahan, C. M., Weinberg, A. D., Woo, S. L. C., Paul Ehrlich, H., et al. (2009) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2009.26 · Cited by 182
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brem, H., Stojadinovic, O., Diegelmann, R. F., Entero, H., Lee, B., Pastar, I., Golinko, M., Rosenberg, H., & Tomic-Canic, M.
- Venue
- Molecular Medicine
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 30-39
- ISSN
- 1076-1551 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-3658
- OpenAlex
- W1214867471
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Markers in Patients with Chronic Wounds to Guide Surgical Debridement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2119/2006-00054.brem
- The paper
- Brem, H., Stojadinovic, O., Diegelmann, R. F., Entero, H., Lee, B., Pastar, I., Golinko, M., Rosenberg, H., & Tomic-Canic, M. (2007). Molecular Markers in Patients with Chronic Wounds to Guide Surgical Debridement. Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2119/2006-00054.brem
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.