WITHDRAWN: Efficacy and Safety of Ivermectin for Treatment and prophylaxis of COVID-19 Pandemic
Open accessAbstract
Background: Up-to-date, there is no recognized effective treatment or vaccine for the treatment of COVID-19 that emphasize urgency around distinctive effective therapies. This study aims to evaluate the anti-parasitic medication efficacy "Ivermectin" plus standard care in the treatment of mild/moderate and severely ill cases with COVID 19 infection, as well as prophylaxis of health care and/ or household contacts. Subject and methods: 600 subjects; 400 symptomatic confirmed COVID-19 patients and 200 health care and household contacts distributed over 6 groups; Group I : 100 patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 infection received a 4-days course of Ivermectin plus standard of care; Group II: 100 patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 infection received hydroxychloroquine plus standard care; Group III: 100 patients with severe COVID-19 infection received Ivermectin plus standar care; Group IV : 100 patients with Severe COVID-19 infection received hydroxychloroquine plus standard care. Routine laboratory investigations and rT-PCR, were reported before and after initiation of treatment. Group V stick to personal protective measures (PPM ) plus Ivermectin o . 4mg / kg on empty stomach to be repeated after one week, and group VI stick to PPM only .Both groups V&VI were followed for two weeks .. Results: Patients received ivermectin early reported substantial recovery of laboratory investigations; and significant reduction in rT-PCR conversion days. A substantial improvement and reduction in mortality rate in Ivermectin treated groups; group I (99% & 0.0%, respectively) and group III (94% & 2.0% respectively) versus hydroxychloroquine plus standard care treated groups; group II (74% and 4%, respectively) and group IV (50% and 20%, respectively). Ivermectin had significantly reduced the incidence of infection in health care and household contacts up to 2% compared to 10% in non ivermectin group when used as a prophylaxis. Conclusion: Early addition of Ivermectin to standard care is very effective drug for treatment of COVID-19 patients with significant reduction in mortality,rt-PCR conversion days , recovery time hospital stay compared to Hydroxychloroquine plus standard care. Early use of Ivermectin is very useful for controlling COVID 19 infections; prophylaxis and improving cytokines storm
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Elgazzar et al. study was retracted from the preprint server Research Square due to ethical concerns.
“For example, on July 15, 2021, a study by Elgazzar et al. from Egypt was retracted from the preprint server Research Square due to “ethical concerns” [11].”
From Ivermectin for COVID-19: Addressing Potential Bias and Medical Fraud (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kory, P., Meduri, G. U., Varon, J., Iglesias, J., & Marik, P. E. (2021) · American Journal of Therapeutics · doi:10.1097/mjt.0000000000001377 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19
Popp, M., Reis, S., Schießer, S., Hausinger, R. I., Stegemann, M., Metzendorf, M.-I., Kranke, P., Meybohm, P., Skoetz, N., & Weibel, S. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd015017.pub3 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Prophylaxis against covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis
Bartoszko, J. J., Siemieniuk, R. A., Kum, E., Qasim, A., Zeraatkar, D., Martinez, J. P. D., Azab, M., Ibrahim, S., Izcovich, A., Soto, G. B., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n949 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies.
Reardon, S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02081-w · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Kataoka, Y., Banno, M., Tsujimoto, Y., Ariie, T., Taito, S., Suzuki, T., Oide, S., & Furukawa, T. A. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.015 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Retracted
- Authors
- Elgazzar, A., Eltaweel, A., Youssef, S. A., Hany, B., Hafez, M., & Moussa, H.
- Affiliations
- Benha University (EG)
- Benha University
- Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt.
- Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
- Venue
- Research Square
- Published
- 2020-12-28
- OpenAlex
- W4243189714
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Update notices
- retraction (2020-12-28)
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Keywords
- ivermectin, COVID-19 pandemic, hydroxychloroquine, antimalarial drugs, COVID-19 treatment, COVID-19 prevention, household contacts, healthcare workers, mortality reduction, personal protective measures, drug safety, SARS-CoV-2, drug repurposing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review