PreprintCited by 12Plant Stress Responses and ToleranceSeed Germination and PhysiologyPlant Molecular Biology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abscisic acid (ABA) signaling: Finding novel components off the beaten track

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1007/s10725-022-00823-y · Paper page

Abstract

The sesquiterpene abscisic acid (ABA) is an ancient universal stress response molecule. In plants, many ABA-dependent processes operate via the PYR/PYL/RCAR receptor complexes, however, there is evidence suggesting that not all plant responses operate through this mechanism. This is consistent with ABA responses in animals and humans which do not contain such receptors. We hypothesize that plant and animal proteomes harbour proteins with undiscovered ABA-binding sites and propose that carefully curated amino acid search motifs deduced from the binding sites of experimentally confirmed ABA-binding proteins can identify many more candidates in plant and animal proteomes many of which show folds that are compatible with ABA-binding. Plant candidates include annotated ABA downstream signaling components such as SnRK2.2 and SnRK2.6 and proteins with roles in protein folding and RNA polyadenylation, while candidates in the human proteome affect, among other processes, immune responses and tumor progression. If these candidates will eventually be experimentally validated, it will imply that the regulation and tuning of ABA-dependent processes is considerably more complex than hitherto suspected and it will also expand and help to clarify the role of ABA in animal systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1271375/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Wong, A., Bi, C., Pasqualini, S., & Gehring, C.
Affiliations
  • Wenzhou-Kean University (CN)
  • University of Perugia (IT)
Corresponding author
Gehring, Chris
Venue
Plant Growth Regulation
Published
2022-02-02
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
585-592
ISSN
0167-6903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226324762
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Growth Regulation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32100581)
  • Università degli Studi di Perugia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Seed Germination and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
abscisic acid signaling, ABA receptors, PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors, SnRK2.6, protein folding, polyadenylation, immune response, tumor progression, plant stress response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review