PreprintCited by 23Circadian rhythm and melatoninLight effects on plantsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A fuzzy complex in the negative arm regulates circadian clock robustness.

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-47761-z · Paper page

Abstract

Organismal physiology is widely regulated by the circadian clock, a molecular circuit composed of a Transcription-Translation Feedback Loop 1,2. Protein components of the molecular clock are enriched in intrinsically disordered regions, inherently flexible regions that interact with other proteins via short linear binding motifs (SLiMs) 3–5. SLiM-driven interactions contribute to circadian timing and the circadian regulation of the cell. However, the mechanism that allows the formation of dynamic clock complexes remains unclear as structural analysis of these protein-protein interactions has been limited due to inherent protein disorder. Here, we apply a synthetic peptide microarray approach to demonstrate that the core clock forms a fuzzy complex to support circadian robustness 6,7. We found positively charged islands on the clock protein FREQUENCY (FRQ) drove a multi-valent interaction between FRQ and its partner FRQ-interacting RNA Helicase (FRH) that enabled clock robustness rather than the previously-reported feedback 8. We found these positively charged islands were a conserved molecular feature throughout clocks in fungi, insects, and mammals, and may enable the formation of fuzzy complexes. This study constitutes the first mechanistic reason for the uniquely-broad conservation of intrinsic disorder in circadian negative-arm proteins and will aid in the development of the molecular model of clock protein interactions. Furthermore, we anticipate the application of synthetic peptide microarrays to study disordered clock proteins and will be useful in characterizing sites of interaction for clock-specific drug discovery 9.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1328618/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hurley, J., Jankowski, M., Griffith, D., Shastry, D., Pelham, J., Ginell, G., Thomas, J., Karande, P., & Holehouse, A.
Affiliations
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Hurley, Jennifer
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2022-03-28
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
3523-3523
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4395447800
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2045674, CAREER, 2139839, 1247271)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (GM128687, EB022546)
  • Longer Life Foundation
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • Dartmouth College
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Directorate for Education and Human Resources (2139839)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM067545, GM128687, T32GM067545, R35GM128687)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB022546, U01EB022546)
  • Division of Graduate Education (2139839)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
circadian clock, intrinsically disordered regions, FRQ, Neurospora crassa, protein-protein interaction
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Circadian Rhythm, Fungal Proteins, Mutation, Neurospora crassa, Protein Binding, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Protein Array Analysis, CLOCK Proteins, Circadian Clocks, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review