The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Nucleotide Transformer: Building and Evaluating Robust Foundation Models for Human Genomics
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41592-024-02523-z · Paper page
Abstract
Closing the gap between measurable genetic information and observable traits is a longstanding challenge in genomics. Yet, the prediction of molecular phenotypes from DNA sequences alone remains limited and inaccurate, often driven by the scarcity of annotated data and the inability to transfer learnings between prediction tasks. Here, we present an extensive study of foundation models pre-trained on DNA sequences, named the Nucleotide Transformer, integrating information from 3,202 diverse human genomes, as well as 850 genomes from a wide range of species, including model and non-model organisms. These transformer models yield transferable, context-specific representations of nucleotide sequences, which allow for accurate molecular phenotype prediction even in low-data settings. We show that the sequence representations alone match or outperform specialized methods on 12 of 18 prediction tasks, and up to 15 after fine-tuning. Despite no supervision, the transformer models learned to focus attention on key genomic elements, including those that regulate gene expression, such as enhancers. Lastly, we demonstrate that utilizing model representations can improve the prioritization of functional genetic variants. The training and application of foundational models in genomics explored in this study provide a widely applicable stepping stone to bridge the gap of accurate molecular phenotype prediction from DNA sequence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abbas, S. R., Abbas, Z., Zahir, A., & Lee, S. W. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf329 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopez, M., Dalla-Torre, H., Gonzalez, L., Mendoza-Revilla, J., Carranza, N. L., Grzywaczewski, A., Oteri, F., Dallago, C., Trop, E., Sirelkhatim, H., Richard, G., Skwark, M., Beguir, K., & Pierrot, T.
- Affiliations
- Instadeep
- Nvidia (United States) (US)
- InstaDeep
- Corresponding author
- Lopez, Marie
- Pierrot, Thomas
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2023-03-21
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 287-297
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11810778
- OpenAlex
- W4404821554
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 346 · 2025: 242 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 11
- FWCI
- 91.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Keywords
- Nucleotide Transformer, transformer models, low-data settings, cross-species transfer learning, variant prioritization, human genome
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Base Sequence, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review