The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustering predicted structures at the scale of the known protein universe
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-023-06510-w · Paper page
Abstract
Proteins are key to all cellular processes and their structure is important in understanding their function and evolution. Sequence-based predictions of protein structures have increased in accuracy with over 214 million predicted structures available in the AlphaFold database (AFDB). However, studying protein structures at this scale requires highly efficient methods. Here, we developed a structural-alignment based clustering algorithm - Foldseek cluster - that can cluster hundreds of millions of structures. Using this method we have clustered all structures in AFDB, identifying 2.27M non-singleton structural clusters, of which 31% lack annotations representing likely novel structures. Clusters without annotation tend to have few representatives covering only 4% of all proteins in the AFDB. Evolutionary analysis suggests that most clusters are ancient in origin but 4% seem species specific, representing lower quality predictions or examples of de-novo gene birth. Additionally, we show how structural comparisons can be used to predict domain families and their relationships, identifying examples of remote homology. Based on these analyses we identify several examples of human immune related proteins with remote homology in prokaryotic species which illustrates the value of this resource for studying protein function and evolution across the tree of life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Self-citationHighly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025
Self-citationA structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
Akdel, M., Pires, D. E. V., Pardo, E. P., Jänes, J., Zalevsky, A. O., Mészáros, B., Bryant, P., Good, L. L., Laskowski, R. A., Pozzati, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w · Cited by 675
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinegger, M., Beltrao, P., Velankar, S., Varadi, M., Wein, T., Gilchrist, C., Mirdita, M., Jänes, J., Yeo, J., & Barrio-Hernandez, I.
- Affiliations
- Seoul National University (KR)
- ETH Zurich
- European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- EMBL-EBI
- Corresponding author
- Steinegger, Martin
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2023-04-11
- Volume
- 622
- Issue
- 7983
- Pages
- 637-645
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10584675
- OpenAlex
- W4386708656
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 97 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 23
- FWCI
- 32.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- National Research Foundation (2021-R1C1-C102065)
- Seoul National University
- Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2021-R1C1-C102065, 2021-M3A9-I4021220, 2020M3‐A9G7‐103933, RS-2023-00250470)
- ETH Zürich Foundation
- Helmut Horten Stiftung
- Samsung
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- protein structure clustering, structural alignment, protein evolution, domain families, de novo gene birth, immune-related proteins, prokaryotic proteins, protein function
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Humans, Phylogeny, Prokaryotic Cells, Proteins, Species Specificity, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Alignment, Evolution, Molecular, Databases, Protein, Structural Homology, Protein, Molecular Sequence Annotation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review