The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phage tailspike modularity and horizontal gene transfer reveals specificity towards E. coli O-antigen serogroups
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1186/s12985-023-02138-4 · Paper page
Abstract
Background The interaction between bacteriophages and their hosts is intricate and highly specific. Receptor-binding proteins (RBPs) of phages such as tail fibers and tailspikes initiate the infection process. These RBPs bind to diverse outer membrane structures, including the O-antigen, which is a serogroup-specific sugar-based component of the outer lipopolysaccharide layer of Gram-negative bacteria. Among the most virulent E. coli strains is the Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) pathotype dominated by a subset of O-antigen serogroups. Methods Extensive phylogenetic and structural analyses were used to identify and validate specificity correlations between phage RBP subtypes and STEC O-antigen serogroups, relying on the principle of horizontal gene transfer as main driver for RBP evolution. Results We identified O-antigen specific RBP subtypes for seven out of nine most prevalent STEC serogroups (O26, O45, O103, O104, O111, O145 and O157) and seven additional E. coli serogroups (O2, O8, O16, O18, 4s/O22, O77 and O78). Eight phage genera (Gamaleya-, Justusliebig-, Kaguna-, Kayfuna-, Kutter-, Lederberg-, Nouzilly- and Uetakeviruses) emerged for their high proportion of serogroup-specific RBPs. Additionally, we reveal sequence motifs in the RBP region, potentially serving as recombination hotspots between lytic phages. Conclusion The results contribute to a better understanding of mosaicism of phage RBPs, but also demonstrate a method to identify and validate new RBP subtypes for current and future emerging serogroups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Pas, C., Latka, A., Fieseler, L., & Briers, Y.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Ghent University
- ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Briers, Yves
- Venue
- Research Square
- Publisher
- Research Square Platform LLC
- Published
- 2023-04-28
- OpenAlex
- W4367310705
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Vlaams Supercomputer Centrum
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1S79422N, 1240021N)
- Universiteit Gent
- Vlaamse regering
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Escherichia coli research studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- receptor binding protein, horizontal gene transfer, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, phage-host specificity, phage tail fiber, lytic phages, recombination hotspots, sequence motifs, phage evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review