The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analytical Investigation Into Feather Decoration Technique of 17th-18th Century Chinese Royal Hanging Screen
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1186/s40494-021-00555-8 · Paper page
Abstract
Decoration with feather was a universal phenomenon in human history. Objects decorated with feathers were regarded as fine artworks and hence were enormously prized. In ancient China, dotting a surface with kingfisher-feather blue was the most famous, complex and delicate feather decoration technique, called diancui. Although various ancient diancui artworks appear in many museums around the world and some researches have achieved significant results on the history, technique and conservation of diancui, but some key historical details are still not clear. In this research, by the opportunity of restoration, an important collection of the Palace Museum - the “Feather Decoration Hanging Screen with Birds and Flowers Pattern” was rounded analyzed by various scientific technologies. This object is a Chinese royal artwork of Qing dynasty (17th-18th century), decorated with kingfisher and several other bird’s feathers, and present the highest level of this period. As a typical and valuable case, the result provides important clues for solving unclear questions for related academic field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Featherwork in Early and Medieval China
Milburn, O. (2021) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.3.0549 · Cited by 6
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, A., Wang, N., Kong, Y.-J., Hou, J.-Y., Li, G., & Lei, Y.
- Affiliations
- Palace Museum (CN)
- The Palace Museum
- Corresponding author
- Gu, An
- Venue
- Heritage Science
- Published
- 2021-03-19
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2050-7445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3179977615
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Heritage Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Conservation Techniques and Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Historical Art and Architecture Studies
- Keywords
- Qing dynasty, Palace Museum, decorative arts, restoration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
