PreprintCited by 13DNA Repair MechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism of DNA unwinding by hexameric MCM8-9 in complex with HROB

Open access
Acharya, Ananya, Bret, Helene, Huang, Jen-Wei, Muetze, Martin, Goese, Martin, Kissling, Vera, Seidel, Ralf, Ciccia, Alberto, Guérois, Raphaël, Cejka, Petr·2023·Nature Communications

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-47936-8

Abstract

The human MCM8-9 helicase functions in concert with HROB in the context of homologous recombination, but its precise function is unknown. To gain insights into how HROB regulates MCM8-9, we first used molecular modeling and biochemistry to define their interaction interface. We show that HROB makes important contacts with both MCM8 and MCM9 subunits, which directly promotes its DNA-dependent ATPase and helicase activities. MCM8-9-HROB preferentially binds and unwinds branched DNA structures, and single-molecule experiments reveal a low DNA unwinding processivity. MCM8-9 unwinds DNA as a hexameric complex that assembles from dimers on DNA in the presence of ATP, which is prerequisite for its helicase function. The hexamer formation thus involves two repeating protein-protein interfaces forming between the alternating MCM8 and MCM9 subunits. One of these interfaces is rather stable and forms an obligate heterodimer, while the other interface is labile and mediates the assembly of the hexamer on DNA, independently of HROB. The ATPase site composed of the subunits forming the labile interface disproportionally contributes to DNA unwinding. HROB does not affect the MCM8-9 ring formation, but promotes DNA unwinding downstream by possibly coordinating ATP hydrolysis with structural transitions accompanying translocation of MCM8-9 on DNA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3054483/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Acharya, A., Bret, H., Huang, J.-W., Muetze, M., Goese, M., Kissling, V., Seidel, R., Ciccia, A., Guérois, R., & Cejka, P.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of Leipzig
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Institute for Research in Biomedicine
Corresponding author
Guérois, Raphaël
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-06-26
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
3584-3584
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4395690436
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Institute for Research in Biomedicine
  • European Commission (SAB 100382164, 724863, HORIZON2020)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-CE44-0009)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (207588, 310030, 205199)
  • Freistaat Sachsen (100382164, SAB 100382164)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA197774)
  • European Social Fund (SAB 100382164, 100382164)
  • H2020 European Research Council (101018257)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
DNA unwinding, DNA damage response, helicase activation, protein-protein interfaces, branched DNA, hexamer assembly, ATPase site, MCM8, MCM9

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review