The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A unified approach to evolutionary conservation and population constraint in protein domains highlights structural features and pathogenic sites
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-024-06117-5 · Paper page
Abstract
The molecular evolution of a protein is constrained by its structure and function. This is how patterns of evolutionary conservation in a multiple sequence alignment can be exploited by algorithms like AlphaFold to predict structure and other features. Human population sequencing offers the potential to show similar trends within a single species. However, although gene-level and domain-level aggregation of variants is routinely applied, data still preclude simple residue-level analysis per protein. Here, we aggregate population variants within protein domain families to define the missense enrichment score (MES) which captures population constraint at positions in the family. Contrasting MES with evolutionary conservation identifies positions that are key to protein-ligand and protein-protein interaction specificity as well as locations critical to folding, function and pathogenicity. This approach also highlights a new class of pathogenic variant hot spot at positions that are evolutionarily conserved yet enriched in missense variants. We found 5,086 positions in 766 domain families were missense depleted (covering 365,300 residues in the human proteome) and 13,490 positions in 3,591 families were enriched in missense variants (340,829 residues in human) and provide a map of residue-level population constraint in human. Comparison to 61,214 three dimensional structures from the Protein Data Bank, covering 40,394 sequences from 3,661 Pfam domains, and over 10,000 variants labelled pathogenic in ClinVar provides validation of these sites in context with structure and pathogenicity. Application to the GPCR family identifies 17 sites important for ligand binding specificity as well as sites key to function in all members of the GPCR family. For nuclear receptor ligand binding domains, of 10 likely specificity sites, six are in direct contact with ligands. In P450s the most conserved and missense depleted sites interact with the electron donor. This study will have broad applications to: (a) providing focus for functional studies of specific proteins by mutagenesis; (b) refining pathogenicity prediction models; (c) highlighting which residue interactions to target when refining the specificity of small-molecule drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- MacGowan, S. A., Madeira, F., Britto-Borges, T., & Barton, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Dundee (GB)
- European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
- University of Dundee
- Corresponding author
- Barton, Geoffrey J.
- Venue
- Communications Biology
- Published
- 2023-07-14
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 447-447
- ISSN
- 2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11009406
- OpenAlex
- W4394724740
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University of Dundee
- Wellcome Trust (218259/Z/19/Z, 101651/Z/13/Z, 100150/Z/12/Z)
- UK Research and Innovation
- Research Councils UK (BB/J019364/1, BB/R014752/1)
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/X018628/1, BB/J019364/1, BB/R014752/1, BB/L020742/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- protein domains, population constraints, missense mutations, amino acid conservation, protein structure prediction, pathogenicity prediction, buried residues, protein binding sites
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Base Sequence, Humans, Protein Binding, Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review