The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterizing the omics landscape based on 10,000+ datasets
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41598-025-87256-5
Abstract
The characteristics of data produced by omics technologies are pivotal, as they critically influence the feasibility and effectiveness of computational methods applied in downstream analyses, such as data harmonization and differential abundance analyses. Furthermore, variability in these data characteristics across datasets plays a crucial role, leading to diverging outcomes in benchmarking studies, which are the basis for guiding the selection of appropriate analysis methods in all omics fields. At the same time, downstream analysis tools are developed and used in distinct omics communities due to the presumed differing data characteristics arising from the respective omics technology. We investigate on over ten thousand datasets how proteomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics, and microbiome data vary in specific data characteristics. We were able to show patterns of data characteristics specific to the investigated omics types and provide a tool, which allows researchers to characterize and assess how representative a given omics dataset is for an omics discipline. Moreover, we illustrate how data characteristics can impact analysis at the example of normalization in the presence of sample-dependent proportions of missing values. Due to the varying nature of the investigated omics data characteristics, we encourage the inspection of data characteristics in the context of benchmark studies and for downstream analyses to prevent suboptimal method selection and unintended bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Brombacher, E., Schilling, O., & Kreutz, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kreutz, Clemens
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2024-03-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3189-3189
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11762699
- OpenAlex
- W4406813592
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CIBSS-EXC 2189, 405351425, 322977937, 01KU1916, GRK 2606, 466359513, EXC‐2189, SFB-1479 –, 444936968, SFB1597, 441891347, 01KU1915A, 390939984, 431336276, GRK 2344, SFB1453, 446058856, 438496892, 499552394, 423813989)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (EXC-2189, 390939984, 441891347, 01KU1915A, 438496892, 01KU1916)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics, transcriptomics, microbiome data, data normalization, missing data, data harmonization, differential abundance, benchmarking, dataset representativeness
- MeSH terms
- Lipidomics, Humans, Computational Biology, Genomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics, Transcriptome, Microbiota, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review