PreprintCited by 6Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterizing the omics landscape based on 10,000+ datasets

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41598-025-87256-5

Abstract

The characteristics of data produced by omics technologies are pivotal, as they critically influence the feasibility and effectiveness of computational methods applied in downstream analyses, such as data harmonization and differential abundance analyses. Furthermore, variability in these data characteristics across datasets plays a crucial role, leading to diverging outcomes in benchmarking studies, which are the basis for guiding the selection of appropriate analysis methods in all omics fields. At the same time, downstream analysis tools are developed and used in distinct omics communities due to the presumed differing data characteristics arising from the respective omics technology. We investigate on over ten thousand datasets how proteomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics, and microbiome data vary in specific data characteristics. We were able to show patterns of data characteristics specific to the investigated omics types and provide a tool, which allows researchers to characterize and assess how representative a given omics dataset is for an omics discipline. Moreover, we illustrate how data characteristics can impact analysis at the example of normalization in the presence of sample-dependent proportions of missing values. Due to the varying nature of the investigated omics data characteristics, we encourage the inspection of data characteristics in the context of benchmark studies and for downstream analyses to prevent suboptimal method selection and unintended bias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3978776/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brombacher, E., Schilling, O., & Kreutz, C.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Kreutz, Clemens
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-03-05
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
3189-3189
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406813592
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CIBSS-EXC 2189, 405351425, 322977937, 01KU1916, GRK 2606, 466359513, EXC‐2189, SFB-1479 –, 444936968, SFB1597, 441891347, 01KU1915A, 390939984, 431336276, GRK 2344, SFB1453, 446058856, 438496892, 499552394, 423813989)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (EXC-2189, 390939984, 441891347, 01KU1915A, 438496892, 01KU1916)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics, transcriptomics, microbiome data, data normalization, missing data, data harmonization, differential abundance, benchmarking, dataset representativeness
MeSH terms
Lipidomics, Humans, Computational Biology, Genomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics, Transcriptome, Microbiota, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review